Conviction under Sections 341, 323/34, 325/34 IPC was upheld on appeal but sentences were reduced to release on probation with Rs.10,000 total compensation to the injured. The complainant sought enhancement of compensation. The High Court found the appellate order legal and proper and dismissed the revision petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:28268]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1449/2022
Kanhaiya Lal Jain S/o Shri Rameshwar Jain, R/o Balapura, P.s. Karwar, At Present R/o Dei, P.s. Dei, District Bundi
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J K MoolChandani, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
28/07/2025
fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] uSuoka ftyk cwanh }kjk fu;fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 02@15 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 07-02-20 ds ek/;e ls v;kph@vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 341] 323@34] 325@34 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vkjksi esa nks"kfl) djkj nsrs gq, /kkjk 341 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vijk/k ds fy, ,d ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o 500@&:i;s vFkZn.M o vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M 01 fnol ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl] /kkjk 323@34 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vijk/k ds fy, ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o 1000@&:i;s vFkZn.M o vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M 01
[2025:RJ-JP:28268]
[CRLR-1449/2022]
(2 of 3)
ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o /kkjk 325@34 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vijk/k ds fy, rhu o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o 3000@&:i;s vFkZn.M o vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M 03 ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nafMr fd;k x;k] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj vfHk;qDRkx.k dh vksj ls nkafMd vihy la[;k 17@21 izLrqr dh x;h ftl ij fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] uSuoka ftyk cwanh }kjk fnukad 04-07-22 dks fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs gq, vfHk;qDrx.k dh nks"kflf) dk;e j[kh x;h] ysfdu n.Mkns'k dks vikLr djrs gq, vfHk;qDRkx.k dks ifjoh{kk dk ykHk fn;k x;k rFkk pkjksa vfHk;qDrx.k dks 2500@&:i;s&2500@&:i;s dqy 10]000@&:i;s {kfriwfrZ vnk fd;s tkus o mlesa ls vkgr jktsUnz dks 7]000@&:i;s o 'ks"k vkgrx.k ikjl] foey o dUgS;kyky] ftuds lk/kkj.k pksVsa vkbZ] dks izfrdj fnyk;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls euksgj flag cuke jktLFkku jkT; ¼2015½ 6 lqizhe 624 izLrqr djrs gq, ;g fuosnu fd;k fd ifjoknh@vkgr dks ;Fkksfpr izfrdj ugha fnyk;k x;k gS] vr% izfrdj jkf'k c<k;h tkosA
fo}ku vf/koDrk v;kph@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls vk{ksfir vihyh; U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; dks fof/k lEer gksuk crkrs gq, fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
lHkh i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
izdj.k esa ?kVuk o"kZ 2014 dh gS] vkgr jktsUnz ds ikao esa vfLFkHkax dh xaHkhj migfr dkfjr gqbZ gS] 'ks"k rhuksa vkgrx.k ds lk/kkj.k pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gSA i{kdkjksa dh gSfl;r vkfn dks ns[krs gq, fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk tks izfrdj jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gS] mlesa bl fuxjkuh U;k;ky; }kjk gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA vihyk/khu vk{ksfir vkns'k rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gS] vr% ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA
[2025:RJ-JP:28268]
[CRLR-1449/2022]
(3 of 3)
ifj.kker% fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; dh iqf"V djrs gq;s ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k] ;fn izkIr gks j[kk gS rks] bl vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk vfoyEc ykSVk;k tkosA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate court was justified in releasing the convicted accused on probation and awarding Rs.10,000 total compensation instead of enhanced compensation to the injured complainant.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Meen Singh vs State of RajasthanReferred¶22
(2015) 6 Supreme 624
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanhaiya Lal Jain
State Of Rajasthan
Satyanarayan
Jodhraj
Manraj
Dilip @ Dilkhush
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
