Allowed

Kailash Maurya S/O Gulabchand v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Jul 2025CRLMB/7699/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to the petitioner, Kailash Maurya, under Section 483 CrPC. The court held that since the petitioner is a functionary required for clarifications regarding his wife and no evidence of accomplices exists, the bail plea is accepted with a specific promise to appear for clarification.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioner with a promise to appear for clarification if required by the Police in the meantime.

Kailash Maurya S/O Gulabchand Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:27973]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7699/2025

¶4

Kailash Maurya S/o Gulabchand, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Kantaliya, Sojat, Police Station Badge, District Pali. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Beawar District Beawar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Chand Dewanda, Adv. Mr. Ajay Poonia, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

25/07/2025

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= ch ,u ,l ,l dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk C;koj flVh] ftyk C;koj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 205@25 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 115¼2½] 126¼2½] 109¼1½ ch ,u ,l esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mldh iRuh ds fdlh vU; O;fDr ls izse laca/k Fks] bl ckr dks ysdj feF;k vkjksi.k fd;k x;k gS] izdj.k esa ckn vuqla/kku vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 14-05-25 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] mlds iq= dh ns[kjs[k djus okyk dksbZ ugha gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶15

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

[2025:RJ-JP:27973]

[CRLMB-7699/2025]

(2 of 2)

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA

¶20

orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ;g vkjksi gS fd mlus viuh iRuh ds lkFk /kkjnkj gfFk;kj ls ekjihV dj flj o ikao esa pksVsa igqapkbZA

¶21

vkgr ds dksbZ pksV xaHkhj vFkok izk.k?kkrd gks] ,slk izdV ugha gqvk gSA izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dSYkk'k ekS;Z iq= Lo- xqykc pan dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA

¶23

( UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

Murari Lal Sharma /204

Kailash Maurya S/O Gulabchand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Maurya S/O Gulabchand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaliya @ Kalya @ Dochya S/O Heera Vs State of Rajasthan

Chauthmal S/O Badri Lal, Vs Rajneesh S/O Shri Shishpal Chamar

Suresh S/O Om Prakash @ Ram Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Lalit Kumar Yadav S/O Harpal Singh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Wahid S/O Aasam Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Kumawat S/O Shri Radheyshyam Kumawat Vs State of Rajasthan