FIR quashed under Section 528 BNSS based on compromise; offences under Sections 420/406 IPC; reliance on Gian Singh and Ramgopal precedents for quashing non-compoundable offences via inherent powers.
FIR No. 232/2023 and all consequential proceedings quashed and set aside ¶¶24-¶25
The FIR No. 232/2023 and all consequential proceedings are quashed and set aside based on amicable compromise between parties and precedent of Gian Singh and Ramgopal. ¶¶23-¶24
[2025:RJ-JP:25450]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Accused-Petitioners
Versus
---Respondent
----Complainant-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
10/07/2025
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-3685/2025]
[2025:RJ-JP:25450]
(SAMEER JAIN),J
GAURAV/73
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR No. 232/2023 registered for offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC can be quashed based on compromise between parties.¶¶16
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of PunjabRelied on¶¶21
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] · Who else cites this
Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya PradeshRelied on¶¶21
Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531] · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
How this case reached the court
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
