The petition for directions for a fair investigation was disposed of by directing the petitioner to file an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before the trial court, relying on Sakiri Vasu, to obtain the investigation status report.
Petitioner directed to move application under Section 200 Cr.P.C. for status report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.3680/2024
Babulal Yogi S/o Shri Ram Nath Yogi, Resident Of Jogiyon Ka Dhani, Village Mahangi, Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur (P.s. Raysar, Jaipur Rural)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rani Bhandari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, PP
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
29/10/2025
[CRLMP-3680/2024]
(2 of 2)
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Karan/52
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the investigating agency was conducting a fair, proper, and impartial investigation?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State Of U.P. And OthersReferred¶17
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State Of U.P. And Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409 · Who else cites this
Babulal Yogi
State Of Rajasthan
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
