Criminal miscellaneous petitions were withdrawn by counsel for the petitioners. The Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn, clarifying that the withdrawal does not prejudice the petitioners' right to avail appropriate alternate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:21669]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3083/2025
Rakib Ahmad Son Of Shri Rafiq Ahmad, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Chhota Mohalla, Sadat Malpura, Police Station Malpura, District Tonk Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3084/2025 Abdul Rub @ Guddu Son Of Shri Abdulla, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Chhota Mohalla, Near Masjid, Malpura, Police Station Malpura, District Tonk (Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Hasan, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Abdul Wahid Naqvi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order
22/05/2025
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that the said withdrawal will not cause any prejudice in availing appropriate alternate remedy. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
JKP/75-76
Rakib Ahmad
State Of Rajasthan
Abdul Rub @ Guddu
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
