The Court disposed of the petition for quashing the FIR, noting that the investigation found the charges proven. The petitioner was granted liberty to avail of alternate remedies before the trial Court.
Liberty granted to avail alternate remedy before the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:36042]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1094/2019
Rajesh S/o Sh. Hari Prasad, R/o Mohalla Baidh Gali, Sapotra, District Karauli.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goyal, Adv. Ms. Ritu Jindal,Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. with |
| Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A. | |
| Ms. Shivani Choudhary, Adv. for | |
| Mr. Ashish Agrawal,Adv. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
08/09/2025
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:36042]
[CRLMP-1094/2019]
Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC have been found to be proven. As the charges against the petitioner has been found to be proven and the charge-sheet has been prepared but could not be submitted before the trial Court due to the aforesaid stay order granted by the Coordinate Bench of this Court.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
TANISHA /50
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR should be quashed in light of the investigation report proving charges against the petitioner.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajesh
State Of Rajasthan
Ramesh Chand Sharma
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
