Allowed

Nepallal S/O Kanhaiyalal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Sept 2025CRLMB/10862/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second bail applications by two accused in NDPS case FIR 03/2024 after earlier withdrawal; recovery was 21.110 kg ganja, slightly above commercial quantity; charge-sheet filed and only two witnesses examined so far. Court granted bail on personal bond of Rs.1 lakh with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicants to be released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1 lakh plus two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, subject to conditions including attendance at trial and no tampering with evidence.

Nepallal S/O Kanhaiyalal Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:35954]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

(1) S.B. Criminal Misc. 2^nd Bail Application No. 10862/2025

¶4

Nepallal S/o Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Pagariya Police Station Pagariya Tehsil Pachpahad District Jhalawar (Raj)

¶5

(At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj)

¶6

----Accused/Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

(2) S.B. Criminal Misc. 2^nd Bail Application No. 10943/2025

¶12

Shakir Mohammed S/o Hanish Mohammed, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Raipur, Police Station Raipur, Tehsil Pidawa, District Jhalawar. (Raj.)

¶13

(Applicant Is In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi)

¶14

----Accused/Applicant

¶15

Versus

¶16

C.B.N., Through Special P.P.

¶17

----Respondent

¶18

For Applicant(s)	: Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. Ms. Drishti Mishra, Adv. with Mr. Ali Mohd. Khan, Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Tej Prakash Sharma, Spl.PP Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A.
	Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A.
	Mr. Vaibhav Jhakar, Adv.

¶19

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

¶20

Order

¶21

08/09/2025

¶22

1- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr lkfdj eksgEen dh vksj ls iwoZ esa izLrqr izFke tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k&3720@2025 rFkk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr usikyyky dh vksj ls iwoZ esa izLrqr izFke tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k&6408@2025] dks

¶23

(2 of 4) [CRLMB-10862/2025]

¶24

[2025:RJ-JP:35954]

¶25

izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk izR;kg`r ¼withdraw½ fd, tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k x;k FkkA rRi'pkr~ izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA 2- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr usikyyky dh vksj ls f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk&i= la[;k&10862@2025 o izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr lkfdj eksgEen dh vksj ls f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk&i= la[;k&10943@2025] viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk] 2023 dh /kkjk&483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&lh-ch-,u- HkokuheaMh] ftyk&>kykokM+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&03@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@20¼ b ½¼ ii ½¼ c ½ Lokid vkS"kf/k vkSj eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e] 1985 esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶26

3- mDr nksuksa tekur izkFkZuk&i= ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls lacaf/kr gksus ds dkj.k budk fuLrkj.k lqfo/kk dh nf"V ls bl ,d vkns'k }kjk fd;k tk jgk gSA 4- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks bl ekeys esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds dCts ls fnukad 25-09-2024 dks 21-110 fdyksxzke xkatk cjken gksuk crk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k yxHkx ,d o"kZ ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSaA ekeys esa vHkh rd dsoyek= nks xokgksa ds c;ku ys[kc) fd;s x;s gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k uo;qod gSA fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) vU; dksbZ vkijkf/kd ekeyk iathc) gksuk ugha ik;k x;k gSA ekeys esa vkjksi i= is'k fd;k tk pqdk gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% mijksDr vk/kkjksa ij izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk U;k;ky; dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d n"Vkarksa dh vksj vkdf"kZr fd;k x;k %&

¶27

Bhola Shikari Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh, Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 13236/2024, Decided on 11.11.2024 &

(3 of 4)

[2025:RJ-JP:35954]

[CRLMB-10862/2025]

Imran Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, reported in 2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 11050

¶32

5- blds foijhr fo}ku fof'k"B yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk mijksDr rdksZa dk l[r fojks/k fd;k x;k rFkk O;Dr fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds dCts ls O;kolkf;d ek=k ls vf/kd ek=k esa xkatk cjken fd;k x;k gS tks xaHkhj vijk/k gSA /kkjk 37 Lokid vkS"kf/k vkSj eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e] 1985 ds vkKkid izko/kkuksa ds e/; utj izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA fo}ku fof'k"B yksd vfHk;kstd dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd vkjksi i= is'k gks tkus o fopkj.k 'kq: gks tkus ek= ls izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k tekur ij NksMs+ tkus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gks tkrs gSaA vr% vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds tekur vkosnu&i=ksa dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fo}ku fof'k"B yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk U;k;ky; dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d n"Vkarksa dh vksj vkdf"kZr fd;k x;k %&

¶33

Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Mohit Aggarwal, Petitions For Special Leave To Appeal (Crl.) No. 6128-29/2022, Decided on 19 July, 2022

¶34

Union of India Vs. Rattan Mallik Alias Habul, reported in (2009) 2 Supreme Court Cases 624 &

¶35

Kalyan Chandra Sarkar Vs. Rajesh Ranjan Alias Pappu Yadav And Another, reported in (2004) 7 Supreme Court Cases 528.

¶36

6- cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶37

7- i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds dCts ls fnukad 25-09-2024 dks 21-110 fdyksxzke xkatk cjken fd;k x;k gSA xkats dh fu/kkZfjr okf.kfT;d ek=k 20 fdyksxzke gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds dCts ls cjken'kqnk xkatk okf.kfT;d ek=k ls FkksM+k gh vf/kd gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks fnukad 25-09-2024 dks fxj¶rkj fd;k x;k Fkk] rc ls os U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSaA ekeys esa vkjksi i= is'k fd;k tk pqdk gSA ekeys esa fopkj.k Hkh izkjEHk gks pqdk gS] ysfdu vHkh rd dsoyek= nks xokgksa ds gh c;ku ys[kc) fd;s x;s gSaA izdj.k ds 'ks"k fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izdj.k ds

[2025:RJ-JP:35954]

[CRLMB-10862/2025]

(4 of 4)

leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq,] ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶42

8- ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr usikyyky iq= dUgS;kyky dh vksj ls izLrqr f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk&i= la[;k&10862@2025 rFkk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr lkfdj eksgEen iq= guhl eksgEen dh vksj ls izLrqr f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk&i= la[;k&10943@2025] dks Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&03@2024] iqfyl Fkkuk&lh-ch-,u- HkokuheaMh] ftyk&>kykokM+ esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn mifLFkfr gsrq izR;sd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks rLnhd'kqnk lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djk nsos rFkk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mUgsa vfoyEc fuEu 'krksZa ds v/khu tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos %& 'krZ %&

¶43

izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vknsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd os izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksaxs] izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k] xokgksa dks izHkkfor ugha djsaxs] mUgsa Mjk,axs&/kedk,axs ugha o fopkj.k U;k;ky; dh vuqefr ds fcuk ns'k ugha NksMsaxs] vius fuokl LFkku dk irk cnyus dh lwpuk] U;k;ky; o vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh dks miyC/k djok,axs rFkk leku izÑfr dk dksbZ vijk/k ugha djsaxsA ;fn izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk leku izÑfr dk vijk/k dkfjr fd;k tkrk gS rks vfHk;kstu i{k] izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh tekur dks fujLr djok;s tkus gsrq l{ke U;k;ky; ds le{k vkosnu izLrqr djus dks Lora= jgsxkA

¶44

(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J

¶45

LOKESH RAJ /3-4

Nepallal S/O Kanhaiyalal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nepallal S/O Kanhaiyalal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Jain and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Pratap Singh Rathore Son of Shri Chotu Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Manpal S/O Chhiddi Vs State of Rajasthan

Pankaj S/O Shri Mahendra Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh S/O Sh. Hari Prasad B/C Brahamin Vs State of Rajasthan

Shakir Mohammed S/O Hanish Mohammed Vs C.B.N.