Raised a bail petition challenging the refusal of bail on the ground that the petitioner is a female in the initial stage of the trial. The court considered the implications of the initial FIR regarding delay and the Secretary's opinion, and granted bail upon special consideration.
Petitioner Anju W/o Shri Vikas Kumar is released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:42004]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9971/2025
Anju W/o Shri Vikas Kumar, R/o Rawta Ki Dhani, Tan Bayal, Police Station Nizampur, District Mahendragarh, Hariyana. (At Present Confined At District Jail Sikar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Meena, Adv. Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Order
14/10/2025
izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ¼/kkjk 439 na-iz-la-½ iqfyl Fkkuk ikVu] lhdj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 313@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 365] 302 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk funksZ"k gS] mls izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og yacs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] lgvfHk;qDrk dh tekur ekuuh; U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] vr% izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
[CRLMB-9971/2025]
[2025:RJ-JP:42004]
(2 of 3)
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
tekur izkFkZuk i= ij mHk;i{kksa dks lquk x;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
orZeku izdj.k esa izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk efgyk gS] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vkSj lk{khx.k ds /kkjk 180 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds c;kuksa esa mls uketn ugha fd;k x;k gS] mlds }kjk dksbZ vkijkf/kd dR; fd;k x;k gks] bl rF; dks vfHk;kstu i{k Li"V ugha dj ik;k gS] izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk }kjk erd gsear ls eksckbZy ij ckrphr djus ds vk/kkj ij mls izdj.k esa varoZfyr fd;k x;k gS] mlds }kjk e`rd dh gR;k dh x;h gks ;k ;kstuk cuk;h x;h gks ;k og "kM~;a= esa 'kkfey gks] bl fLFkfr dks vfHk;kstu i{k lkfcr ugha dj ik;k gSA lgvfHk;qDrk y{eh nsoh dk ,dyihB vkijkf/kd fofo/k tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k 16267@2023 led{k ihB }kjk fnukad 27-02-2024 dks Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk ds fo:) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] og fnukad 23-07-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA
rFkk vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk vUtw iRuh fodkl dqekj dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ;k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos]
[2025:RJ-JP:42004]
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-9971/2025]
mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls gLrxr izdj.k esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J
MANISH SAINI /48 (8)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, being a female in the initial FIR and undergoing trial, should be granted bail on the ground that she has no criminal antecedents and the case requires special consideration ba
Whether the Inspector's opinion regarding the denial of postponement in the initial FIR affects the current petition for bail application.
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail on the grounds of the nature of the evidence against her and immediate trial requirements.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anju W/o Shri Vikas Kumar
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
Chandra Prakash Shrimali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
