Suresh Kumar Porwal S/O Late Shri Mangilal Porwal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Aug 2025CRLMB/9332/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted under Section 483 BNSS in NDPS case (Section 8/15) where petitioner had no contraband recovery, co-accused already on bail, no antecedents, and prolonged custody since 05.07.2025. Conditions: personal bond Rs.50,000/-, two sureties Rs.25,000/- each, monthly police station attendance.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, subject to conditions ¶¶20-¶29

Suresh Kumar Porwal S/O Late Shri Mangilal Porwal Vs… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:30814]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9332/2025

¶4

Suresh Kumar Porwal S/o Late Shri Mangilal Porwal, R/o House No. 172, Ward No. 07, Village Turkiya Post Dorwada, Police Station Narayangrh, Distt. Mandsaur (M.P.) Presently House No. 02, Gali No. 01, Abhinandan Colony, Mandsaur, Police Station Kotwali, Distt. Mandsaur (M.P.) (Accused Presently Confined In Central Jal, Ajmer).

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.S. Rajawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order

¶11

08/08/2025

¶12

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.51/2025 registered at Police Station GRP Ajmer, District Ajmer for the offence punishable under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act.

¶13

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that co-accused of this case, who was found in possession of contraband, has already been granted benefit of bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court. He further submits that admittedly, no contraband has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has been made accused in this case solely on

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:30814]

[CRLMB-9332/2025]

the basis of interrogation of the co-accused person, who was found in possession of the alleged contraband. He argues that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since 05.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶19

I have considered the contentions.

¶20

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that co-accused of this case, who was found in possession of contraband, has been granted benefit of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; no contraband has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶21

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Suresh Kumar Porwal S/o Late Shri Mangilal Porwal shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is

[2025:RJ-JP:30814]

[CRLMB-9332/2025]

(3 of 3)

transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶26

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded.

¶27

Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.

¶28

If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.

¶29

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance.

¶30

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶31

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶32

MADAN/S-425

Suresh Kumar Porwal S/O Late Shri Mangilal Porwal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar Porwal S/O Late Shri Mangilal Porwal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangat Singh S/O Didar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Wasim S/O Zakir Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan

Intjar Ahmed S/O Shri Sakil Ahmed Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashish Sharma S/O Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Sitaram Saini S/O Shri Parmanand Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Jitendra S/O Shri Umraav Singh Vs State of Rajasthan