Allowed

Mangat Singh S/O Didar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Aug 2025CRLMB/8281/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed bail to the petitioner arrested under the Rajasthan Excise Act for false implication, directing release on personal bond with sureties and monthly police station attendance.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail providing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each with conditions for monthly police station attendance.

Mangat Singh S/O Didar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:30521]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8281/2025

¶4

Mangat Singh S/o Didar Singh, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Barwada Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar ( Presently Accused Is In Judicial Custody In Central Jail Alwar District Alwar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sweta Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶11

Order

¶12

07/08/2025

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.16/2025-26 registered at Police Station Excise Prohibition Squad Alwar (East), District Alwar (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Sections 16/54 & 54A of Rajasthan Excise Act.

¶14

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:30521]

[CRLMB-8281/2025]

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application & submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as 17 other cases have already been registered against him.

¶19

I have considered the contentions.

¶20

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶21

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Mangat Singh S/o Didar Singh , shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in first week of every month, till trial is concluded.

(3 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:30521]

[CRLMB-8281/2025]

Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.

¶27

If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court.

¶28

Office is directed to send copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance.

¶29

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶30

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J

¶31

GAUTAM JAIN /182

Mangat Singh S/O Didar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mangat Singh S/O Didar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Purushottam S/O Kalu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Bawariya S/O Ramlal Bawariya Vs State of Rajasthan

Shankar Lal S/O Motiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Wasim S/O Zakir Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan

Intjar Ahmed S/O Shri Sakil Ahmed Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopichand S/O Sh. Birbal Ram Vs C.B.N.