Allowed¶19

Kaliya @ Kalya @ Dochya S/O Heera v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Jul 2025CRLMB/6992/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail allowed; petitioner Kaliya @ Kalya @ Dochya s/o Heera, District Jail Jhalawar; FIR No. 209/2024, PS Jhalawar Sadar, District Jhalawar; offences under Section(s) 3/25 & 5/25 of Arms Act; application under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C.; charge sheet filed; judicial custody since long; bond Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each; Justice Uma Shanker Vyas; Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench; decision dated 24/07/2025; [2025:RJ-JP:27696]; running head [CRLMB-6992/2025].

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: release of the accused-petitioner on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, with the stipulation that he appear before the trial Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. ¶19

Kaliya @ Kalya @ Dochya S/O Heera Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 209/2024 (Police Station Jhalawar Sadar), taking into account that the charge sheet has been filed.

¶18

Court's answer

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the charge sheet has been filed, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, the Court deemed it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Ratio / Principle

The bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. is allowed; the accused-petitioner is to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

REGULAR BAIL GRANTED — High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6992/2025, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uma Shanker Vyas, decided 24/07/2025 ([2025:RJ-JP:27696]). Petitioner Kaliya @ Kalya @ Dochya S/o Heera (aged about 22, resident of Titarwasa, PS Sadar Jhalawar), confined in District Jail Jhalawar, applied under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. for regular bail in FIR No. 209/2024, Police Station Jhalawar Sadar, District Jhalawar, for offence(s) under Section(s) 3/25 & 5/25 of Arms Act. Counsel pleaded false implication, pointed out that the charge sheet had been filed, and urged enlargement citing prolonged judicial custody and expected delay in trial; the Public Prosecutor opposed. Considering the overall facts and circumstances and the fact that the charge sheet had been filed, but expressly without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, the Court deemed it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail: personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with stipulation to appear on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon. Application allowed; no precedent was cited or engaged with.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:27696]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6992/2025

¶4

Kaliya @ Kalya @ Dochya S/o Heera, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Titarwasa, Police Station Sadar Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhalawar).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Singh Yaduvanshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶11

24/07/2025

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.209/2024 registered at Police Station Jhalawar Sadar, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 3/25 & 5/25 of Arms Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accusedpetitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that charge sheet has been filed. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:27696]

[CRLMB-6992/2025]

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that charge sheet has been filed, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accusedpetitioner Kaliya @ Kalya @ Dochya S/o Heera shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶21

DANISH USMANI /228

Kaliya @ Kalya @ Dochya S/O Heera v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaliya @ Kalya @ Dochya S/O Heera v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govindram S/O Shivajiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalukhan Son of Shri Hurmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shyam Singh S/O Chander Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Chauthmal S/O Badri Lal, Vs Rajneesh S/O Shri Shishpal Chamar

Suresh S/O Om Prakash @ Ram Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Panwar S/O Lt. Shri Suresh Panwar Vs State of Rajasthan