The High Court dismissed the second bail application of an accused charged with cheating and unfair means in a judicial examination, relying on technical evidence linking her mobile devices to malpractice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:19609]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 6145/2025
Sunita W/o Shri Manish Kumar D/o Shri Rampratap Bishnoi, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Word Number 12, Rawla Mandi, Police Station Rawla Mandi, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.). (Accused Petitioner Is In Confinement At Central Jail Jaipur And In Custody Since 30.01.2025)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
09/05/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:19609]
[CRLMB-6145/2025]
(2 of 3)
19.03.2023. The petitioner got selected in the said examination through her own capability and not involved in cheating. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2025 and having a minor child aged about 8 months along with her in the custody, therefore, considering the above facts, the second bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
(3 of 3)
[2025:RJ-JP:19609]
[CRLMB-6145/2025]
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
Keshav/5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail on grounds of false implication, custody duration, and minor child?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sunita W/o Shri Manish Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
