Bail application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed. The court held that the FIR alleged attacks on police and waging of war, with petitioners' names specifically included. The Court rejected the claim that they were merely entrapped, finding no merit in seeking relief from the consequences of the FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:24521]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5195/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Vaishnav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
03/07/2025
izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk xsxy] ftyk&vtesj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 46@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 189¼2½] 190] 125] 126¼2½] 121¼1½] 132] 324¼6½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk o /kkjk 03 lkoZtfud lEifRRk uqdlku fuokj.k vf/kfu;e] 1984 esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuki= is”k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us izdV fd;k fd izkFkhZx.k fldUnj o jetku dks fxjQ~rkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA
vr% izkFkhZx.k fldUnj o jetku dh gn rd ;g izkFkZuki= fu"Qy
gksus ls fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
[2025:RJ-JP:24521]
[CRLMB-5195/2025]
(2 of 2)
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k lksgsy o 'kkSfdu ds laca/k esa cgl lquh xbZA
izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k ekSds ij ugha Fks] mUgsa rks dsoy ml xkao dk gksus ds dkj.k gh feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izdj.k esa ?kVuk dh fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ ohfM;ks fjdkWfMZax Hkh ugha gSA izdj.k ds vUos"k.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd iqfyl tc ekSds ij dk;Zokgh dj jgh Fkh] rks izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k us iFkjko fd;k rFkk iqfyldfeZ;ksa ds lkFk ekjihV dh] ftlls fnus'k gSM dkWULVscy 1904 o jkeflag dkWULVscy 2629 ds 'kjhj ij pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gS vkSj ljdkjh okgu cksysjks {kfrxzLr gqbZ gSA ,slh fLFkr esa ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k fdlh Hkh :i esa ?kVuk esa lafyIr ugha gksA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;k tkosA
geus rdZ&fordZ ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) ekSds ij dk;Zokgh dj jgs iqfyl tkCrs ij iFkjko djus dk vk{ksi gSA izdj.k dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk uke ?kVuk dkfjr djus okyksa esa vafdr gSA ?kVuk esa fnus'k gSM dkWULVscy 1904 o jkeflag dkWULVscy 2629 dks pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gS rFkk ljdkjh okgu Hkh {kfrxzLr gqvk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa izFke n`"V;k ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k tk jgk gksA izdj.k esa vHkh izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ls vUos"k.k fd;k tkuk 'ks"k gSA mi;qZDr leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku eas j[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k lksgsy o 'kkSfdu dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k lksgsy o 'kkSfdu dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
VISHAL SHARMA /97
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to relief from the consequences of the First Information Report alleging waging of war and attacks on police personnel?
9 provisions across 3 enactments
Sikandar S/o Shri Teja
Ramjan S/o Shri Teja
Sohil Khan S/o Shri Naina
Shaukin S/o Shri Anda Ji
State Of Rajasthan
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
