The court granted anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC, holding that the necessity of custodial interrogation is absent given the witnesses are available and the petitioner's social suicide risk justifies release pending trial.
Anticipatory Bail granted
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:24417]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10034/2024
Arif S/o Innas, R/o Village Thalchana, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
03/07/2025
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds varxZr iqfyl Fkkuk igkM+h] ftyk&Mhx esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 442@2023 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 19] 54 jktLFkku vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1950 esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk iznku fd, tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks ekSds ij gksuk ugha crk;k x;k gS] mldk uke dsoy lgvfHk;qDr lath ds }kjk fy, x, 17 vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k ds uke esa vafdr gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vkWuykbu Bxh ls tksM+us dh dksbZ lk{; ugha gSA mudk rdZ gS fd lgvfHk;qDr lath dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk pqdk gSA izdj.k eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.kh; gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo#) iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vuqla/kku esa Hkkx ysus ds fy, rRij gSA mlds fxj¶rkj fd, tkus dh fLFkfr esa
[2025:RJ-JP:24417]
[CRLMB-10034/2024]
(2 of 2)
mldh lkekftd izfr"Bk [kjkc gksxhA vr% mldh vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tk,A
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa ekSds ls fxj¶rkj fd, x, lgvfHk;qDr lath ls gq, vUos"k.k ls irk pyk gS fd lath] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vkSj vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k lkFk feydj ,d fxjksg ds :i esa dk;Z djrs gSa vkSj vkWuykbu Bxh djrs gSaA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls xgu vuqla/kku fd;s tkus dh vko';drk gSA ekeyk lkbcj Økbe ls lacaf/kr gSA vr% mls vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk ugha nh tk,A
IkzLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA
izdj.k esa miyC/k dsl Mk;jh rFkk rF;kRed fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 19] 54 jktLFkku vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1950 ds vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa Hkh izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk uke vafdr gSA izdj.k esa lgvfHk;qDrx.k ls gq, vuqla/kku esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh lafyIrrk crkbZ xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vijk/k esa lafyIr u gksA izdj.k lkbcj Økbe ls tqM+k gqvk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls fgjklr iwNrkN ¼Custodial Interrogation½ dh Hkh vko';drk crkbZ xbZ gSA vr% izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkh&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk&i= varxZr /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
NIMIT GOYAL /25
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner who faces allegations of forgery and threat to public property.
Whether the custodial interrogation and filing of complaint were necessary when witnesses can be summoned during trial.
Whether considerations of physical safety and social suicide warrant a different approach to bail.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Arif S/o Innas
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
