The petitioner failed to appear in the first and second rounds of the hearing for a bail application. The Court found the petitioner uninterested in pursuing the matter.
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:46722]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4979/2025
Rinku S/o Meghraj, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Menpura Police Station Soorwal District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order
19/11/2025
None appeared for the petitioner in the first round.
Even in the second round no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the bail application.
Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J
Arun/210
Rinku S/o Meghraj
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Pramil Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
