Allowed

Sohanlal @ Sonu S/O Shri Malaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 May 2025CRLMB/4927/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS in an FIR under Sections 3/25 and 25(6) of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed false implication and long incarceration; the trial was expected to take time. The court granted bail without expressing any opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Sohanlal @ Sonu S/O Shri Malaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:19051]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4927/2025

¶4

Sohanlal @ Sonu S/o Shri Malaram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Basdayal, District Kotuptali-Behror. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Alwar).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶11

Judgment

¶12

06/05/2025

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.19/2025 registered at Police Station-Basdayal, District-Kotputali-Behror for the offences under Sections 3/25, 25(6) of Arms Act.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Though there are history of nine criminal antecedents but petitioner has been acquitted in two cases pending against him. Petitioner is behind the Bar since long. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail

[CRLMB-4927/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:19051]

(2 of 2)

application.

On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner -Sohanlal @ Sonu S/o Shri Malaram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 19/2025 registered at Police Station- Basdayal, DistrictKotputali-Behror on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶23

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶24

DEEPAK/153

Sohanlal @ Sonu S/O Shri Malaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sohanlal @ Sonu S/O Shri Malaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rampratap S/O Kishanlal @ Kashanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishal @ Laku S/O Ramdayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Tarun @ Vikki S/O Shri Ramjilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shadhab S/O Rahis Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Alias Kalla S/O Sujan Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Joshi S/O Mahendra Vs State of Rajasthan