Allowed¶23

Tokir S/O Atikul Islam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 May 2025CRLMB/3932/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court Jaipur; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3932/2025 (CRLMB-3932/2025); Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur; order dated 07/05/2025; bail allowed under Section 483 of BNSS / Section 483 B.N.S.S.; FIR No.102/2025, Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa; offence under Section 309(4) of BNS, 2023; petitioner Tokir S/o Atikul Islam, in custody since 27.02.2025; compromise by complainant Amit; personal bond Rs.50,000/-; two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each; opinion on merits expressly reserved; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner Tokir S/o Atikul Islam on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, with appearance before that Court on all dates till conclusion of the trial. ¶23

Tokir S/O Atikul Islam Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶23

Issue for consideration

Whether bail should be granted to petitioner Tokir under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.102/2025 (Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa) for the offence under Section 309(4) of BNS, 2023.

¶13

Court's answer

After considering the rival submissions, the material on record and all facts and circumstances, the Court decided to grant the benefit of bail while expressly refraining from expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case.

¶22

Ratio / Principle

The bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. was allowed; the petitioner Tokir S/o Atikul Islam is to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, with appearance before the trial court on all dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench), Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur — Bail granted. Single-judge order dated 07/05/2025 allowing a bail application under Section 483 of BNSS filed by Tokir S/o Atikul Islam in FIR No.102/2025, Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa, for offences under Section 309(4) of BNS, 2023. Counsel for the petitioner pleaded false implication, absence of criminal antecedents and custody since 27.02.2025; counsel for complainant Amit conceded that a compromise had been effected with respect to the petitioner's alleged act. Without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, the Court allowed the application and directed release of the petitioner on a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, with appearance before the trial court on all dates till conclusion of the trial. No precedent was cited or relied upon.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:19226]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3932/2025

¶4

Tokir S/o Atikul Islam, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ibrahimpur, Police Station Bilara, District Muradabad, Uttar Pradesh. (Presently Confined At District Jail Dausa)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Deepesh Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP
For Complainant	: Mr. Azad Ahmed

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶11

Order

¶12

07/05/2025

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.102/2025 registered at Police Station-Sikandra, District-Dausa for the offences under Section 309(4) of BNS, 2023.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that the complainant-Amit has made compromise in this case. Counsel further submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. Petitioner is behind the bars since 27.02.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time,

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:19226]

[CRLMB-3932/2025]

hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶20

Learned counsel for the complainant fairly acceded that compromise has been effected by complainant-Amit with respect to alleged act of petitioner.

¶21

Learned Public Prosecutor has made formal objections to the bail application.

¶22

On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶23

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner -Tokir S/o Atikul Islam shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶24

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶25

Arun/82

Tokir S/O Atikul Islam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tokir S/O Atikul Islam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shadhab S/O Rahis Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Alias Kalla S/O Sujan Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Joshi S/O Mahendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Singh Alias Rajveer S/O Mahaveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Sain S/O Ramavtar Sain Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Singh Shekhawat @ Happy Singh S/O Shri Rajendra Singh Shekhawat Vs State of Rajasthan