Accused petitioners sought regular bail; after argument, counsel withdrew the application seeking liberty to renew after the Seizure Officer's testimony is recorded. Bail application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty; trial court requested to record Seizure Officer's testimony on priority basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:31104]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2824/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Vishal Gurjar |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Tapesh Agarwal,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
11/08/2025
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this criminal misc. bail application with liberty to renew the prayer of bail after recording testimony of Seizure Officer.
Permission sought for is granted.
Accordingly, this criminal misc. bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
Learned trial Court is requested to record the testimony of Seizure Officer on priority basis.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
LALIT MOHAN /57
Jayveersingh S/o Deedar Singh
Rahul Singh S/o Balwansingh
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
