The High Court of Rajasthan initially remanded the bail application due to multiple charges and judicial custody status, emphasizing the absence of a change in circumstances to re-hear it, thereby refusing temporary bail relief at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:9618]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 2675/2025
Nagendra Singh @ Amit Singh S/o Mahendra Singh, R/o Chhapdel, Police Station Paroli, District Shahpura. (At Present In Sub Jail, Beawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh with Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
05/03/2025
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk fot; uxj] ftyk&C;koj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 305@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 309¼4½] 3¼5½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g f}rh; izkFkZuk&i= is'k fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k Qalk;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur dk izFke izkFkZuk&i= bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 23-10--2024 dks fujLr fd;k x;k Fkk] mlds i'pkr~ izdj.k esa vUos"k.k iw.kZ fd;k tkdj vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS rFkk lgvfHk;qDr jkds'k vkSj iz|qeu dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk pqdk gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gS ,oa ftl lgvfHk;qDr iz|qeu ls cjkenxh gqbZ gS] dks tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa Hkh vafdr ugha gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 25-09-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkosA
[2025:RJ-JP:9618]
[CRLMB-2675/2025]
(2 of 2)
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izdV fd;k fd
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij pkj vU; izdj.k lafLFkr gSaA vr% vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur izkFkZuk i= vuqla/kku ds yafcr gksus ds izdze ij fujLr fd;k x;k FkkA vc izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ dj vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds [kkrs esa dksbZ jkf'k izkIr gksuk vFkok dksbZ cjkenxh gksuk ugha crk;k x;k gSA izFke tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr gksus ds i'pkr lgvfHk;qDrx.k jkds'k vkSj iz|qEuflag dk tekur izkFkZuk i= fnukad 05-02-2025 dks bl U;k;ky; ls Lohdkj gks pqdk gSA izkFkhZ fnukad 25-09-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% mi;qZDr rF;ksa ,oa cnyh gqbZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, bl Lrj ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks] rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk;sA
NIMIT GOYAL /22
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is currently in judicial custody and has an absence order in the main trial.
Whether the petitioner's presence in the trial has been made contingent upon producing security.
Nagendra Singh @ Amit Singh
State of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
