bail application graded as high priority. While admitted, relief of bail is denied by Hoshangabad bench against order of trial court. Application adjourned
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:9623]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 15888/2024
Ramphal S/o Shri Hariom, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Rawat Bhajra, Police Station And Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar. (At Present Accused Is Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh with Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
05/03/2025
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk x<+h ctkuk] ftyk&Hkjriqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 28@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420 vkSj 406 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g f}rh; izkFkZuk&i= is'k fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k Qalk;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur izkFkZuk&i= bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 19-09-2024 dks fujLr fd;k x;k Fkk] mlds i'pkr~ izdj.k esa ih-M- 3 ds :i esa lk{kh jktohj flag ds dFku ys[kc) gq, gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd lk{khx.k jktohj flag vkSj vehj flag nksuksa ds dFku fojks/kkHkklh gSa vkSj izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh ifjoknh i{k ls eqykdkr laca/kh LFkku ds ckjs esa vyx&vyx crk jgs gSaA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ih-M- 3 jktohj flag us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlds lkeus dksbZ nLrkost vkSj udn jkf'k ifjoknh i{k }kjk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks ugha nh xbZ gS] mlus dsoy jkgqy] es?kflag vkSj vfHk;qDr jkeQy ds crk, vuqlkj ;g dFku fd, gSaA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 29-04-2024 ls U;kf;d
[2025:RJ-JP:9623]
[CRLMB-15888/2024]
(2 of 2)
vfHkj{kk esa gSA mlds fo#) iwoZ ds tks 5 vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr gSa] muesa ls rhu izdj.kksa esa mls led{k ihB }kjk tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk pqdk gSA izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkosA
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izdV fd;k fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us jktdh; lsok esa gksdj ikap&ikap yk[k #i;s esa ukSdjh fnyokus dk >kalk nsdj ifjokjh i{k ls dqy 8]61]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k izkIr dh gS] ftlds laca/k esa lk{khx.k Øe'k% ih-M- 1 vehj flag rFkk ih-M- 2 es?k flag us vius dFku fd, gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij leku izd`fr ds ikap vU; izdj.k lafLFkr gSaA vHkh vU; egRoiw.kZ lk{khx.k ds dFku ys[kc) gksuk 'ks"k gSA vr% vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur izkFkZuk&i= fujLr gksus ds i'pkr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k vfHk;kstu i{k dh vksj ls ih-M- 3 jktohj flag ds dFku ys[kc) gq, gSaA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us xokgku ds c;kuksa esa ftl fojks/kkHkkl ds laca/k esa rdZ mBk;k gS] og ekewyh fojks/kkHkkl gS vkSj bl izØe ij ns[ks tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA vfHk;kstu lk{kh la[;k&1 vehj flag us Li"V dFku fd, gSa fd igys <kbZ yk[k #i;s] fQj vxLr esa pSd }kjk lk<+s pkj yk[k #i;s] mlds ckn rhu yk[k #i;s Qksu }kjk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds [kkrs esa Mkys x, gSaA izdj.k esa vHkh vkSj xokgksa dk ijhf{kr gksuk ckdh g S A izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij ikap vU; vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr gSaA iwoZ tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr gksus ds i'pkr izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ,slk dksbZ lkjoku ifjorZu ugha gqvk gS] ftlls izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tk,A vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA
ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
NIMIT GOYAL /21
1 issue framed by the court
What is the relief to be granted to the bail applicant despite being named in Section 274 BNSS despite no evidence produced against him to date in any of the 25 registered cases.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramphal S/o Shri Hariom
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
