Four accused charged under Sections 310(4), 310(5) BNS, Arms Act and Rajasthan Dacoitee Affected Area Act for FIR No.452/2024 sought bail, citing parity with an earlier released co-accused. The court allowed the bail applications and enlarged all four on personal bonds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16465/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, Dy.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
23/01/2025
[CRLMB-16465/2024]
(2 of 3)
S/o Shakoor & Sanu S/o Shri Rijvan be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-16465/2024]
satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they will appear before the trial court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Gourav/3-4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-petitioners in a dacoity case under Sections 310(4), 310(5) BNS with Arms Act and RDA Act offences should be enlarged on bail.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Aarif
Pacchu
Noor Aalam
Sanu
State of Rajasthan, through P.P.
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
