Allowed

Vasu @ Vatsal S/O Virendra Nagar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Feb 2025CRLMB/13736/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hearing an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC, the court granted bail to the petitioner accused of attempt to murder, noting that accomplices had turned police witnesses which raised doubts regarding faith in prosecution evidence.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioner for seven years; the opposite parties concerned will be intimated accordingly.

Vasu @ Vatsal S/O Virendra Nagar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:5253]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13736/2024

¶4

Vasu @ Vatsal S/o Virendra Nagar, R/o Antana, Presently Infront Of Veterinary Hospital, Hat Chowk, Atru, Police Station Atru, District Baran, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined At Sub Jail Atru, District Baran).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶11

Order

¶12

06/02/2025

¶13

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk vV: ftyk ckjka esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 179 @2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 341] 323] 324] 326] 307] 34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuk&i= is”k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd mls izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd og fo|kFkhZ gSA vkgr izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh cgu ds lkFk NsM+NkM+ djrk Fkk blfy, ;g ?kVuk dkfjr gqbZ gSA tks pkdw cjken gqvk gS og lCth dkVus okyk gSA mudk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDr fnukad 26-06-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vkjksi&i= is'k gks pqdk gSA vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% mls tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A

¶15

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ gh eq[; vfHk;qDr gS ftlus vkgr ij pkdqvksa ls okj fd;k gS rFkk vkgr dks dkfjr ,d pksV izk.k?kkrd gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds pkj vU; izdj.k Hkh ntZ gSaA og vknru vijk/kh gSA xEHkhj vijk/k gS] vr% mls tekur dk ykHk ugha fn;k tk,A

¶16

[2025:RJ-JP:5253]

¶17

[CRLMB-13736/2024]

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u

¶19

fd;k x;kA

¶20

i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 307] 341] 323] 34] 324] 326 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vfHk;ksx gSaA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr oklq ij gh vkgr }kjk pkdw ls rhu okj isV esa] nks ck;ha Hkqtk ,oa ,d flj esa ekjus dk vk{ksi yxk;k x;k gSA vr% mldk izdj.k lgvfHk;qDr fgeka'kq ds leku ugha dgk tk ldrk gSA vfHk;qDr ds dCts ls pkdw dh cjkenxh gksuk Hkh izdV gksrk gS rFkk vkgr dks dkfjr pksVksa esa ls ,d pksV izk.k?kkrd gksuk Hkh fpfdRld }kjk izfrosfnr dh xbZ gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds Hkh pkj vU; vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gksuk lkeus vk;k gSA vr% i=koyh ij izLrqr lk{; dks ns[krs gq, bl izØe ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, fcuk] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk&i= vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶22

AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /06

Vasu @ Vatsal S/O Virendra Nagar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vasu @ Vatsal S/O Virendra Nagar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankarlal S/O Sh. Ramnath Vs State of Rajasthan

Pushp Chand Vs State and Anr.

Sadhuram S/O Jiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mujamil S/O Akhlakh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Kumar @ Raju Khatana S/O Shri Krishna Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep S/O Late Shri Ram Dayal Sansi Vs State of Rajasthan