Allowed

Gurudayal @ Billu S/O Mansingh v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Dec 2025CRLMB/15155/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS for alleged possession of illegal liquor pouches under Rajasthan Excise Act. Court granted bail on a personal bond with sureties and conditions including fortnightly police-station presence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, subject to conditions.

Gurudayal @ Billu S/O Mansingh Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15155/2025

¶3

Gurudayal @ Billu S/o Mansingh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Guvada Police Station Harsura District Kotputli-Bahrod. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli (Rajasthan).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

	Versus
The State Of Rajasthan,	Through Pp ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) :	Mr. Mithun Chaturvedi Mr. Rohit Chaturvedi Mr. Saurabh Yadav
For Respondent(s) :	Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari,PP

¶6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶7

Order

¶8

02/12/2025

¶9

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.170/2025 registered at Police Station Harsora, District-Kotputli-Behror for offences under Sections 19 and 54 of Rajasthan Excise Act.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the FIR has been lodged against the present petitioner on the allegation that 48 pouches of illegal liquor were recovered from his possession without any valid permit or licence. Though ten cases are pending against the present petitioner but in all cases he has been bailed out. Petitioner is behind the bars since 18.09.2025. No

¶12

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-15155/2025]

¶13

custodial interrogation is required. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶15

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶16

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner- Gurudayal @ Billu S/o Mansingh be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:-

¶17

(i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Harsora District KotputliBehror in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.

¶18

(ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to

¶19

[CRLMB-15155/2025]

¶20

(3 of 3)

¶21

immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard.

¶22

(iii) that the petitioner shall not repeat any such offence in future.

¶23

(iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail.

¶24

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶25

Arun/145

Gurudayal @ Billu S/O Mansingh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurudayal @ Billu S/O Mansingh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaipal Yadav S/O Shri Tejpal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Ishwar Singh S/O Shri Dharm Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Radha Yogi W/O Sh. Mohan Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shri Balaji Cement Agency Vs M/S Suraj Sales

Deepak Soni S/O Shri Murlidhar Soni Vs the State of Rajasthan

Atik S/O Shri Deen Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan