Allowed¶19

Rinku S/O Raisingh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Nov 2025CRLMB/14842/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail jump; forfeiture of bail bonds after non-appearance on 09.12.2019; arrest warrant; custody through production warrant on 10.10.2025; Section 483 BNSS bail application allowed; FIR No.151/2018 PS Sarmathura District Dholpur; Sections 399 and 402 IPC; Section 3/25 Arms Act; CRLMB-14842/2025; personal bond Rs.50,000/-; two sureties Rs.25,000/- each; Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench; Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur; order dated 14/11/2025; counsel Anil Jain for petitioner, Manju Dave PP for respondent.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner Rinku S/o Raisingh to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, and to appear before that Court on all dates till conclusion of the trial. ¶19

Rinku S/O Raisingh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether bail under Section 483 BNSS should be granted to Rinku S/o Raisingh, accused in FIR No.151/2018 (PS Sarmathura, District Dholpur) for offences under Sections 399 and 402 IPC and Section 3/25 Arms Act, who jumped bail (failed to appear on 09.12.2019, bail bonds forfeited, warrant issued) and was taken into custody on 10.10.2025 through production warrant.

¶12

Court's answer

On consideration of the rival submissions and material on record, the Court was inclined to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case.

¶18

Ratio / Principle

The bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed; petitioner Rinku S/o Raisingh is to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, and to appear before that Court on all dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench (Pramil Kumar Mathur, J.), order dated 14/11/2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14842/2025: bail application under Section 483 BNSS by Rinku S/o Raisingh, confined in District Jail Dholpur, allowed. Petitioner is accused in FIR No.151/2018, Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpur, for offences under Sections 399 and 402 IPC and Section 3/25 Arms Act. The case was characterised as one of bail jump: the petitioner failed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 09.12.2019, whereupon his bail bonds were forfeited and an arrest warrant issued; he was taken into custody on 10.10.2025 through a production warrant and remained in judicial custody thereafter. Bail was granted without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, with appearance before that Court on all dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:45883]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14842/2025

¶4

Rinku S/o Raisingh, Resident Of Village Barauli, Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpur, Raj. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶11

14/11/2025

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.151/2018 registered at Police Station Sarmathura, District-Dholpur for offences under Sections 399 and 402 of IPC and Section 3/25 Arms Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the case of bail jump. He further submits that when the petitioner failed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 09.12.2019, his bail bonds were forfeited and arrest warrant was issued against him. The accused-petitioner was taken in custody on 10.10.2025 through production warrant and has remained in judicial custody since then. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:45883]

[CRLMB-14842/2025]

petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶18

On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner- Rinku S/o Raisingh shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶21

Arun/171

Rinku S/O Raisingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinku S/O Raisingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saikul S/O Noormohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam @ Babi S/O Anwar, Vs the State of Rajasthan

Babu @ Sonavaj Ali S/O Mohd. Shabbir, Vs State of Rajasthan

Devkinandan S/O Girraj Prasad Vs State of Raj.

Harendra S/O Vidyaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramniwas S/O Govindram Vs State of Rajasthan