Allowed

Arpit Alias Bhura S/O Shri Jai Prakash v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Nov 2025CRLMB/14828/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application by an accused in custody since 18-09-2025 for offences under Sections 331(6), 309(4) and 127(2) BNS registered at Kotwali Jaipur. The court noted the trial would take time and granted bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to appearing on every hearing date.

Arpit Alias Bhura S/O Shri Jai Prakash Vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:47690]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14828/2025

¶4

Arpit Alias Bhura S/o Shri Jai Prakash, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Old City Sabji Gali, Dholpur, Station Kotwali, Jaipur (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sahil Duseja For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

25/11/2025

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfiZr mQZ Hkwjk dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 16-10-2025 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk] mls iqfyl Fkkuk eqgkuk&t;iqj 'kgj nf{k.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 548@2025] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 331¼6½] 309¼4½] 127¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA

¶15

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og funksZ"k gSA izkFkhZ fnukad 18-09-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izkFkhZ dk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr ugha gS] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds laca/k esa dksbZ Hkh f'kuk[rxh ijsM+ djokbZ xbZ gS] izdj.k eas vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gSA izdj.k izFke oxZ eftLVªsV }kjk fopkj.kh; gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk

[2025:RJ-JP:47690]

[CRLMB-14828/2025]

(2 of 2)

gS] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶20

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶21

geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdks a Z o fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izkFkhZ fnukad 18-09-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k izFke oxZ eftLVªsV }kjk fopkj.kh; gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA vr% izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] izkFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; o vU; leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% ;g tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@&:i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfiZr mQZ Hkwjk iq= Jh t;izdk'k dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶23

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶24

MAHESH ADWANI /165

Arpit Alias Bhura S/O Shri Jai Prakash v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arpit Alias Bhura S/O Shri Jai Prakash v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar S/O Ramesh Kumar Khardiya Vs State of Rajasthan

Shivsunder S/O Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit Kumar Mahla S/O Ramsukh Mahla Vs State of Rajasthan

Iqbal Husain S/O Mohammad Habeeb Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishram S/O Seduram Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju @ Rajeev S/O Ramchandra Vs State of Rajasthan