Allowed

Vishram S/O Seduram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Nov 2025CRLMB/12187/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail applications by two accused charged under Sections 319(2), 318(4) and 61(2) BNS and Section 66-D I.T. Act arising from FIR No.363/2025 at Bandikui. Charge-sheet filed; trial likely to take long. Court enlarged the petitioners on bail with bonds of Rs.50,000 each and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Accused released on bail on personal bond Rs.50,000 each with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each to satisfaction of the Trial Court.

Vishram S/O Seduram Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:47659]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12186/2025

¶4

Suresh Chand S/o Lalluram, R/o Nangal Haripura Tan Bhandeda, Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12187/2025

¶11

Vishram S/o Seduram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Nagal Haripura, Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui)

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal with
	Mr. Avdhesh Singh Tanwar
	Mr. Ritesh Jain with
	Ms. Poonam Rao &
	Mr. Ramdeo Arya
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P.

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶18

Order

¶19

25/11/2025

¶20

The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.363/2025 registered at Police Station Bandikui (Dausa), District Dausa for the offence(s) punishable under

[2025:RJ-JP:47659]

[CRLMB-12186/2025]

(2 of 3)

Section(s) 319(2), 318(4) & 61(2) B.N.S. and Section 66-D of I.T. Act.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence and they are behind the bars since 07.09.2025. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed.

¶26

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.

¶27

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record.

¶28

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶29

Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accusedpetitioners, namely-Suresh Chand S/o Lalluram & Vishram S/o Seduram, shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which

[2025:RJ-JP:47659]

[CRLMB-12186/2025]

(3 of 3)

the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and

¶34

as and when they are called upon to do so.

¶35

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶36

SAURABH /40-41

Vishram S/O Seduram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishram S/O Seduram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar S/O Ramesh Kumar Khardiya Vs State of Rajasthan

Shivsunder S/O Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit Kumar Mahla S/O Ramsukh Mahla Vs State of Rajasthan

Iqbal Husain S/O Mohammad Habeeb Vs State of Rajasthan

Arpit Alias Bhura S/O Shri Jai Prakash Vs the State of Rajasthan

Raju @ Rajeev S/O Ramchandra Vs State of Rajasthan