Allowed

Harish S/O Danmal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Nov 2025CRLMB/14640/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS for an accused in a Baran FIR for offences including causing grievous hurt by dangerous means. Earlier bail plea was rejected on 03-11-2025. Noting no allegation against the accused's body part and prolonged custody, the court granted bail subject to bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on personal bond of Rs 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs 25,000 each, subject to appearing before the trial court.

Harish S/O Danmal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:45475]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14640/2025 Harish S/o Danmal Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Kachra, P/s Atru, District Baran (Accused Presently Confined in Sub Jail Atru District Baran).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhim Singh Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order

¶10

12/11/2025

¶11

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk vV:] ftyk ckjka esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 367@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 109¼1½] 115¼2½] 352] 189¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶12

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] fnukad 14-09-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] mlds fo:) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj mls tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA

¶13

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkosA

[CRLMB-14640/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:45475]

(2 of 2)

eSaus tekur izkFkZuk i= ds laca/k esa mHk;i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶18

orZeku izdj.k esa vkgr vk'kh"k dqekj ds pkdw ls izk.k?kkrd pksV igqapkus dk vkjksi egkohj ij gS] mldk f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k 12548@2025 vkns'k fnukad 03-11-2025 ds ek/;e ls bl U;k;ky; }kjk vLohdkj fd;k x;k gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ifjoknh vk'kh"k ds ekfeZd vax ij izk.k?kkrd pksV dkfjr djus dk dksbZ vkjksi ugha gS] og fnukad 14-09-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] mlds fo:) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA

¶19

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ rFkk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶20

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr gjh'k iq= nkuey eh.kk dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls gLrxr izdj.k esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶21

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

¶22

MANISH SAINI /09

Harish S/O Danmal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harish S/O Danmal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar Dhayal S/O Shri Ramnarayan Dhayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu Valmiki S/O Shri Suresh @ Raju Valmiki Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam S/O Hanni @ Hanif Vs State of Rajasthan

Sitaram S/O Motiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Taskar Beg @ Govind S/O Chandan Beg Vs State of Rajasthan

Alka Vishnoi D/O Buddharam Vs State of Rajasthan