High Court allowed bail under Section 483 BNSS to two accused petitioners on the ground that the case is triable by a Magistrate and investigation/trial may take considerable time.
Petitioners enlarged on bail to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:982]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
07/01/2025
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:982]
[CRLMB-13643/2024]
therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.
Hamid Khan @ Hamjid S/o Mubarik & 2. Faizan S/o Abdulla @ Dulla, in connection with FIR No.221/2024 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR), J
Keshav/155
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to accused petitioners implicated in an offencetriablebyMagistrate.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
