The single-judge bench granted bail to three petitioners (Raghuveer, Kundan Singh, and Anil) who were in judicial custody, noting they were connected to the same FIR and lacked any criminal antecedents.
Bail granted to all three petitioners subject to furnishing one surety of Rs.10,000 and depositing Rs.10,000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:42553]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12514/2025
Raghuveer S/o Shri Kewal Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Mohanpura Tehsil Fatehbad Police Station Samsabad District Agra (Uttarpradesh) (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13586/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Order
16/10/2025
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq iFkd&iFkd tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk HkkadjksVk] t;iqj ¼if'pe½ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ
[2025:RJ-JP:42553]
[CRLMB-12514/2025]
(2 of 3)
la[;k 248@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 305¼d½] 331¼4½ ch-,u-,l- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
pwafd mDr nksuksa tekur vkosnu ,d gh izFke lwpuk ls lacaf/kr gSa] vr% mDr nksuksa tekur vkosnuksa dk fuLrkj.k ,d lkFk ,d gh vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk jgk gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gaS] mUgsa izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gS] os yacs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gSa] muls dksbZ cjkenxh 'ks"k ugha gS] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj mUgsa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA
orZeku izdj.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) pksjh dk vkjksi gS] os fnukad 03-09-2025 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSa] mul s dksbZ cjkenxh 'ks"k ugha gS] izdj.k ds vuqla/kku esa le; yxsxkA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr j?kqohj o dqUnu ds fo:) iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ ugha jgk gS] tcfd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfuy ds fo:) ,d izdj.k varxZr /kkjk 4@25 vkElZ ,DV dk ntZ gksuk ik;k x;k gSA
vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr 1- j?kqohj iq= dsoy flag 2- dqUnu flag
iq= jkeizlkn o 3- vfuy iq= uRFkhyky dh vksj ls izLrqr nksuksa tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky;
[2025:RJ-JP:42553]
[CRLMB-12514/2025]
(3 of 3)
esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mUgsa cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq izR;sd }kjk ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkosa rFkk mudh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks] rks mUgsa gLrxr izdj.k esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J
KISHAN SONI /34-35
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to three petitioners connected with the same FIR who are in judicial custody.
Raghuveer
Kundan Singh
Anil
State Of Rajasthan
Chandra Prakash Shrimali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
