Allowed

Krishan @ Bodan S/O Subhash v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Nov 2025CRLMB/12745/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS arising from FIR No. 153/2025, Behror Sadar. Accused in custody since August 2025; iron rod recovered from him, simple injuries on complainants, co-accused already granted bail. Bail allowed with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, with conditions to appear before the trial court.

Krishan @ Bodan S/O Subhash Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:44718]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12745/2025 Krishan @ Bodan S/o Subhash, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Mawadi, Police Station Behror Sadar. (At Present In Sub- Jail Behror)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain AAG

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order

¶10

07/11/2025

¶11

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk cgjksM lnj ftyk dksViksryh cgjksM+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 153@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 126¼2½] 115¼2½] 189¼2½] 332¼c½] 352] 351¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶12

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 17-08-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA mlds fo#) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA mlls lfj;k cjken gksuk crk;k x;k gS] tcfd ?kVuk dh fjiksVZ esa mlds }kjk fiLrkSy ysdj vkuk crk;k x;k gSA fiz;ka'kq o ohjsanz vkgr crk, x, gSa] ftuds vkbZ pksVsa lk/kkj.k izd`fr dh gSa] izk.k?kkrd ugha gSaA lgvfHk;qDrx.k vk'kh"k dqekj o lR;ohj dk tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k Øe'k% 12080@2025] 12081@2025 vkns'k fnukad 23-09-2025 dks led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gS] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj mls tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA

[2025:RJ-JP:44718]

[CRLMB-12745/2025]

(2 of 2)

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkosA

¶17

eSaus tekur izkFkZuk i=ksa ds laca/k esa mHk;i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶18

orZeku izdj.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 17-08-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA ?kVuk dh fjiksVZ esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks fiLrkSy ysdj vkuk crk;k x;k gS] ysfdu lk{kh@vkgr ohjsUnz flag o fiz;ka'kq us izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk muds lkFk yksgs ds lfj, ls ekjihV djuk crk;k x;k gSA yksgs dk lfj;k izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ls cjken gks pqdk gSA vkgr ds 'kjhj ij vkbZ pksVsa izk.k?kkrd ugha gSaA lgvfHk;qDrx.k vk'kh"k dqekj o lR;ohj dk tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k Øe'k% 12080@2025] 12081@2025 vkns'k fnukad 23-09-2025 dks led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA

¶19

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ rFkk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶20

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr d".k mQZ cksnu iq= lqHkk"k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls gLrxr izdj.k esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶21

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

¶22

KISHAN SONI /75

Krishan @ Bodan S/O Subhash v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishan @ Bodan S/O Subhash v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kapil S/O Jethanand Vs State of Rajasthan

Nitin @ Najim S/O Shyonarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramswaroop Uppadhaya S/O Shri Bhawar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas Ghosliya S/O Shri Ganpat Lal Ghosliya Vs State of Rajasthan

Kani Devi W/O Late Shri Jamanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Imran @ Ashu Paya S/O Maksood Bhai Vs State of Rajasthan