Allowed

Hemant Kumar Karol S/O Meghraj Karol v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Oct 2025CRLMB/12460/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS by an accused arrested for offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 112(2) and 61(2)(a) BNS and Section 66D IT Act. Considering custody length, absence of antecedents and Magistrate-triable offences, the court enlarged the petitioner on bail with bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, subject to Section 480(3) BNSS conditions.

Hemant Kumar Karol S/O Meghraj Karol Vs State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:42397]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12460/2025

¶4

Hemant Kumar Karol S/o Meghraj Karol, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bairwa Mohalla, Ward No. 28, City Sawai Madhopur. (Presently Confined At District Jail Sawai Madhopur).

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order

¶11

16/10/2025

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, “the BNSS”). The accused-petitioner (for brevity, “the petitioner”) has been arrested in connection with FIR No.280 dated 16.09.2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 112(2) and 61(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity “the BNS”) and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amended) Act 2008 (for brevity “the Act 2008”).

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case wherein, he is in custody since 16.09.2025. He further submits that he has no criminal antecedents and the offences are triable by Magistrate. He, therefore, prays for release of the petitioner on bail.

[2025:RJ-JP:42397]

[CRLMB-12460/2025]

(2 of 2)

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered.

¶18

Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the nature of accusation against him, his length of custody, absence of criminal antecedents and the offences being triable by Magistrate; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Hemant Kumar Karol S/o Meghraj Karol shall be released on bail under Section 483 BNSS in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of ₹50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 480(3) BNSS.

¶20

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

¶21

Tahir/155

Hemant Kumar Karol S/O Meghraj Karol v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemant Kumar Karol S/O Meghraj Karol v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Sharma S/O Shri Devendra Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Surendra Kumar S/O Ghanshyam Vs State of Rajasthan

Lokendra S/O Jitendra, Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishvendra Singh S/O Bharat Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Asha Devi D/O Late Kishanlal, Vs the State of Rajasthan

Banty Saharan S/O Sh. Rai Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan