Accused-petitioners sought to withdraw their criminal miscellaneous petition after arguing at length; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition, disposing of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:42284]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6640/2025
---Accused-Petitioners
Versus
...Respondent
| ----Respondent/Complainant |
|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. Simran Bharati for |
|---|---|
| Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
15/10/2025
After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this criminal misc. petition.
The same is dismissed accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of
accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
DIKSHA /43
Lokendra S/o Jitendra
Ruchendra S/o Omendra
Rajendra S/o Shivsingh
Rupendra S/o Randheer
Chandrakalan W/o Rajendra
Rajvati W/o Jitendra
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
