Allowed

Sohil S/O Jahid v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Nov 2025CRLMB/12089/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail applications under Section 483 BNSS by three accused in FIR No. 259/2025 (Deeg) involving cheating and forgery offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66D of the IT Act. Considering the facts, evidence collected, period of custody since 30-08-2025 and likely trial delay without expressing final opinion on merits, bail granted subject to personal and surety bonds.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted: personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each; release if not wanted in other cases.

Sohil S/O Jahid Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:46141]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12089/2025

¶4

Sohil S/o Jahid, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Khairawa, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶5

Shaukin S/o Aas Mohammad, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Khaichatan, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12090/2025 Saikul S/o Shri Hanif, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Sahsan, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj.) (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail, Deeg).

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

______________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Jh jkgqy flufluokj Jh jkgqy vxzoky For Respondent(s) : Jh vfer xqIrk] yksd vfHk;kstd

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶18

Order

¶19

17-11-2025

¶20

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 10-09-2025 ds fo:) ;s iFkd&iFkd tekur

¶21

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-12089/2025]

¶22

[2025:RJ-JP:46141]

¶23

vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 483 ch-,u-,l-,l- mUgsa iqfyl Fkkuk tqjgjk] ftyk Mhx esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 259@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 319¼2½] 318¼4½] 336¼3½]338] 340¼2½] 317¼5½] 303¼2½] 308¼2½] 313] 61¼2½a,] Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 66Mh vkbZ-Vh-,DV esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd, x, gSaA lHkh tekur vkosnu i= ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls lacaf/kr gksus ds dkj.k budk fuLrkj.k ,d lkFk fd;k tk jgk gS A

¶24

cgl lquh xbZ A

¶25

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] izkFkhZx.k fnukad 30-08-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vuqla/kku o fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gS] vr% izkFkhZx.k dks tekur ij NksM+k tkos A

¶26

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i=ksa dk fojks/k fd;k A

¶27

geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZ o fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vk;h lk{;] izkFkhZx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; o vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZx.k dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶28

ifj.kker% ;s tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;s tkrs gSa rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@& :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- lksfgy iq= tkfgn] 2- 'kkSdhu iq= vkl ekSgEen o 3- lSdqy iq= guhQ dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶29

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶30

Rishikesh Soni/52-53

Sohil S/O Jahid v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sohil S/O Jahid v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandramohan Meena S/O Ganpat Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay S/O Sh. Ramesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Gunwant Patel S/O Amrit Bhai Vs the State of Rajasthan

Karan Singh @ Charan Singh S/O Shri Omprakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Akshay Kumar Gautam Son of Kailash Chand Gautam Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishor S/O Ballo Vs State of Rajasthan