This bail application was filed for two petitioners in remand custody. The High Court examined the facts and noted the delay in disposal, ultimately granting bail and returning them to police custody subject to court proceedings.
Petitioners granted bail and directed to be remanded to the custody of the police.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:45620]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14365/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
______________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Jh misUnz flag jkBkSM+ Jh d`".kdkUr iaokj For Respondent(s) : Jh vfer xqIrk] yksd vfHk;kstd _______________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
13-11-2025
izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 28-10-2025 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 483 ch-,u-,l-,l- mls iqfyl Fkkuk lkbZcj dzkbZe] >qU>quw esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 05@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 316¼2½] 318¼4½] 61¼2½ ch-,u-,l- o 66 Mh- vkbZ-Vh-,DV esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZ A
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] izkFkhZx.k fnukad&14-10-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZx.k dks tekur ij NksM+k tkos A
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k A
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-14365/2025]
[2025:RJ-JP:45620]
geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZ o fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vk;h lk{;] izkFkhZx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; o vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZx.k dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;g tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@& :i;s dh nks lqn<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k xquoUr iVsy iq= ver HkkbZ o ekSfyd flag iq= eku flag dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
Rishikesh Soni/154
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail is allowed when the petitioner has been in judicial custody for two months.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rishikesh Soni/154Referred¶21
Rishikesh Soni/154
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gunwant Patel
Maulik Singh
The State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
