Allowed

Sarup S/O Sorap v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC28 Oct 2025CRLMB/11846/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application by an accused aged about 19 in a cheating and forgery case involving an Android mobile phone with SIM and WhatsApp used to circulate fake old currency notes. The court noted no recovery of cheated money, co-accused already on bail, and delay in trial, and allowed bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, subject to court's satisfaction and appearance at hearings.

Sarup S/O Sorap Vs the State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:43176]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11846/2025

¶4

Sarup S/o Sorap, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Padasala, Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manjeet Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain AAAG

¶10

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order

¶11

28/10/2025

¶12

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk fd'kux<+ ckl ftyk [kSjFky& frtkjk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 348@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 319¼2½] 318¼4½] 338] 336¼3½] 340¼2½] 61¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk vkSj 66Mh lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh vf/kfu;e] 2008 esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] yacs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj mls tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA

¶14

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkosA

¶15

eSaus tekur izkFkZuk i=ksa ds laca/k esa mHk;i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

[2025:RJ-JP:43176]

[CRLMB-11846/2025]

(2 of 2)

orZeku izdj.k esa ?kVuk ds rF;ksa ds vuqlkj iqfyldfeZ;ksa dks nkSjkus x'r eq[kfcj dh lwpuk ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr lk:i o mldk cqvk dk yM+dk Qjgku vyoj jksM+ ls nkSaxMk tkus okys jkLrs ds ikl can gksVy ds ckgj feys vkSj mudh ryk'kh esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds dCts ls ,.Mªk;M eksckby ohoks daiuh dk] ftlesa fle yxh gqbZ vkSj okVl,i pkyw feyk vkSj okVl,i ij fofHkUu yksxksa dks iqjkus flDds vkSj djalh uksVksa dh QksVks Hksth xbZ rFkk mu yksxksa dks iqjkuh flDds ,oa uksV cspus dk izyksHku Hkjk ,d okWbZl fjdkWfMZax Hkstk tkuk izkIr gqvkA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr us Bxh djds fdlh ls dksbZ jkf'k izkIr dh gks ,slk rF; vuqla/kku esa lkeus ugha vk;k gSA lgvfHk;qDr Qjgku dh tekur gksuk crk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr yacs le; ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA fopkj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA

¶20

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ rFkk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr lk:i iq= lksjki dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls gLrxr izdj.k esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶22

( CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

¶23

KISHAN SONI /102

Sarup S/O Sorap v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarup S/O Sorap v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yusuf S/O Toti Vs the State of Rajasthan

Maina Devi W/O Pawan Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Sahun S/O Kalu Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mohan Lal S/O Ramphool Vs State of Rajasthan

Tejpaal @ Kalu S/O Girdhari Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas Garhwal S/O Sh. Bhagwat Singh @ Bhagchand Vs the State of Rajasthan