Allowed

Yusuf S/O Toti v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC27 Oct 2025CRLMB/11746/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three co-accused sought regular bail under Section 483 BNSS for offences under Sections 3 and 4/8 of the Bovine Act registered at Police Station Kaman. The court noted similar accused had earlier been granted bail and allowed both applications on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. one lakh each.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted to all three petitioners on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Yusuf S/O Toti Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:42952]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11586/2025

¶4

Sahun S/o Kalu, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Akata, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶5

Syosingh S/o Chhav Khan, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Village Akata, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11746/2025 Yusuf S/o Toti, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Akata, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI

¶18

Order

¶19

27/10/2025

¶20

izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq iFkd&iFkd tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 ch,u,l,l iqfyl Fkkuk dkek ftyk Mhx esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 72@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 3] 4@8 vkj-ch-,- ,DV esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

[2025:RJ-JP:42952]

[CRLMB-11586/2025]

(2 of 3)

pwafd mDr nksuksa tekur vkosnu ,d gh izFke lwpuk ls lacaf/kr gSa] vr% mDr nksuksa tekur vkosnuksa dk fuLrkj.k ,d lkFk ,d gh vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶25

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gaS] mUgsa izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gS] os yacs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gSa] muls dksbZ cjkenxh 'ks"k ugha gS] vr% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj mUgsa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA

¶26

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶27

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶28

orZeku izdj.k esa izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ij xkSoa'kh; i'kqvksa dk o/k dj xkSekal dks vius dCts esa j[kus dk vkjksi gSA ;gh vkjksi lgvfHk;qDr eqLrkd vkSj rS;~;c gqlSu ij Fks] ftudk tekur izkFkZuk i= led{k ihB }kjk ,dyihB vkijkf/kd fofo/k f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk la[;k 10761@2024 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 03-09-2024 ds }kjk Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ij vkjksfir vijk/k lgvfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) vkjksfir vijk/k ls fHkUu ugha gSA

¶29

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ rFkk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶30

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- lkgqu iq= dkyw 2- L;ksflag iq= Nko [kka 3- ;qlqQ iq= rksrh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g nksuksa tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkrs gSa vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZx.k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk

¶31

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11586/2025]

¶32

[2025:RJ-JP:42952]

¶33

O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mudh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls gLrxr izdj.k esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶34

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

¶35

KISHAN SONI /18-19

Yusuf S/O Toti v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yusuf S/O Toti v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemant Sunariya S/O Damodar Sunariya Vs State of Rajasthan

Sohel Khan @ Golu Pathan S/O Firoz Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Afjal Hussain S/O Abdul Salam Vs the State of Rajasthan

Maina Devi W/O Pawan Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Sahun S/O Kalu Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sitaram Son of Ramvilas @ Dole Vs State of Rajasthan