Allowed

Ashraf @ Golu S/O Alladin v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Oct 2025CRLMB/11826/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail applications under Section 483 BNSS arising from FIR No.124/2025, PS Deoli Manjhi, Kota Rural, for offence under Section 305(a) BNS. The court, without expressing opinion on merits, allowed bail on account of long judicial custody and delayed trial, subject to bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 each with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, to satisfaction of trial court.

Ashraf @ Golu S/O Alladin Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:41325]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11826/2025

¶4

Ashraf @ Golu S/o Alladin, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Islam Nagar, Police Station Deolimanjhi, District Kota (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota District Kota)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12737/2025

¶11

Raees Mohammad @ Raees Gurjar S/o Babu @ Ali Hussain, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dhakdo And Fakiro Ka Mohalla, Mandita, Police Station Sangod, District Kota, Presently 144, Sanjay Nagar, Kaithun, Police Station Kaithun, District Kota.

¶12

Ajauddin @ Kaju S/o Kamaruddin, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Islam Nagar, Police Station Deolimanjhi, District Kota. (Presently Cofined In Central Jail Kota)

¶13

----Petitioners

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶16

----Respondent

¶17

For Petitioner(s)	: Ms. Anushree Sharma, Adv.
	Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma,Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad,PP

¶18

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order

¶19

10/10/2025

¶20

These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.124/2025 registered at Police Station Deoli Manjhi, District Kota Rural for the offence(s) under Section(s) 305(a) of B.N.S.

¶21

Learned counsels for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. They further submits that the accused-

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:41325]

[CRLMB-11826/2025]

petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶26

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶27

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, perused the material available on record the accusedpetitioners have been in judicial custody since long but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶28

Therefore, these bail applications are allowed and accusedpetitioners namely 1.Ashraf @ Golu S/o Alladin 2. Raees Mohammad @ Raees Gurjar S/o Babu @ Ali Hussain 3.Ajauddin @ Kaju S/o Kamaruddin are ordered to be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶29

Considering the criminal antecedents of the accusedpetitioners, it is made clear that if they are found to be involved in offences of a similar nature in future, the benefit of bail granted to the accused-petitioners by this Court may be considered for cancellation.

¶30

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

¶31

GAURAV SHARMA /65-66

Ashraf @ Golu S/O Alladin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashraf @ Golu S/O Alladin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Kumar Taneja S/O Shri Kishan Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Satish S/O Sovran Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jasveer Singh S/O Darshan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Shyamlal S/O Gangaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Raees Mohammad @ Raees Gurjar S/O Babu @ Ali Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram S/O Late Shriram Nayak Vs State of Rajasthan