Remanded

Umesh Mathur S/O Late Shri Govind Chand Mathur v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Rajasthan HC13 Oct 2025CRLMB/10923/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order lists two connected criminal bail applications before the Rajasthan High Court Bench at Jaipur. The court notes the matter was remitted to the Remand Bench due to a conflict of interest of the presiding judge as Chief Metropolitan Magistrate charging the accused.

What did the court decide?

Bail applications remanded to the Remand Bench after the regular judge's withdrawal due to conflict of interest.

Umesh Mathur S/O Late Shri Govind Chand Mathur Vs Central… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:41513]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

10923/2025

¶5

Umesh Mathur S/o Late Shri Govind Chand Mathur, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Flat No. 3-K, Tower-A, Oak Forest, Pundang Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶6

(Presently Accused Petitioner Is Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

Central Bureau Of Investigation, Through Special Public Prosecutor.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶13

11006/2025

¶14

Rakesh Bhasin S/o Late Shri K.l. Bhasin, Aged About 66 Years, R/o 90, Usha Colony, Vidya Path, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶15

(Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶16

----Petitioner

¶17

Versus

¶18

Central Bureau Of Investigation, Through Special PP

¶19

----Respondent

¶20

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Adv. With Mr. Harsh Joshi, Adv. Mr. Chinmaya Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Sahil Rajpurohit, Adv. Mr. S.S. Hora, Adv. Mr. Sahajveer Baveja, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Agarwal, Adv.
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Shyam Singh Yadav, Spl. PP CBI with
		Mr. Tarun Yadav, Adv.
		Mr. Pradeep Singh, Adv.
		Mr. Rajesh Meena, Inspector of
		Police CBI/AC-II, Delhi(I.O.)

(2 of 5)

[2025:RJ-JP:41513]

[CRLMB-10923/2025]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

¶25

Order

¶26

13/10/2025

¶27

mDr nksuksa tekur vkosnu izkFkZuk&i= ,d gh vijk/k ,oa ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds laca/k esa gksus ls mDr nksuksa tekur vkosnu izkFkZuk&i=ksa dk fuLrkj.k ,d gh vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶28

izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k mes'k ekFkqj o jkds'k Hklhu dh vksj ls fu;fer tekur gsrq ;s tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 ch,u,l,l ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk& lhchvkbZ@,-lh-&kk@ubZ fnYyh ftyk& ubZ fnYyh ] esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& vkjlh2172025,0017 ] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 61¼2½ ch-,u-,l- ,oa /kkjk 7] 7,] 8] 9] 10 o 12 Hkz"Vkpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e] 1988 ¼la'kks/ku 2018½ esa is’k fd;k x;k gSA

¶29

fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh nhid pkSgku dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr mes'k ekFkqj iw.kZr;k funksZ"k gS rFkk mls izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og u rks ykHkkFkhZ gS vkSj u gh mlls dksbZ jkf'k cjken gqbZ gS] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr daiuh dk ,d dkfeZd ek= gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk lg&vfHk;qDr euh"k feJk ds dgus ij jkds'k Hklhu dks fj'or dh jkf'k nsuk crk;k x;k gS] mDr lg&vfHk;qDr euh"k feJk dh tekur bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 07-10-2025 dks Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izdj.k esa VsyhQksu okrkZvksa dh VªkafLØIV ds lanHkZ esa uk rks dksbZ ,Q,l,y fjiksVZ izLrqr gqbZ gS uk gh vfHk;kstu Lohd`fr izkIr gqbZ gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 12-07-2025 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gS ,oa mlds fo#) dksbZ iwoZ nks"kflf) dh lk{; i=koyh ij miyC/k ugha gS ,oa izdj.k esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo#) vkjksi i= fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izLrqr gks pqdk gS] ftlds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur dk vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkosA

(3 of 5)

[2025:RJ-JP:41513]

[CRLMB-10923/2025]

muds }kjk vius dFkuksa ds leFkZu esa fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkar is'k fd;s x;s%&

¶34

1- Criminal Appeal No. 2251/2022, Vipulbhai Mansinhbhai Chaudhary Vs State Of Gujrat

¶35

2- Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No (s) 5809/2015, Abdul Nasir Vs State Of Rajasthan

¶36

3- Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No (s) 8432/2023, Suraj Vijay Agarwal Vs The State Of Maharashtra

¶37

4- Criminal Appeal No. 570/2009, Avtar Singh Vs State of Punjab

¶38

5- (2012) 1 SCC 40, Sanjay Chandra Vs CBI

¶39

6- S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7037/2020, Ajay Kumar garg VS State of rajasthan

¶40

7- S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10015/2021, Sugam Kumar Vs state Of Rajasthan

¶41

fo}ku vf/koDRkk Jh ,l-,l- gksjk dk dFku gS fd izdj.k esa vuqla/kku izkjaHk djus ls iwoZ vfHk;kstu Lohdfr izkIr ugha dh xbZ gS] ftlls izdj.k esa /kkjk 17, ih-lh- ,DV dh ikyuk ugha gksus ls laiw.kZ vuqla/kku dk;Zokgh nwf"kr gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izdj.k esa Qksu Vsfiax dh dk;Zokgh Hkh fof/klEer ugha gS] D;ksafd mls fjdkWMZ djus ls iwoZ izdj.k esa uk rks dksbZ vkikr fLFkfr Fkh] uk gh tuthou dh lqj{kk dks dksbZ [krjk Fkk ,oa izkFkhZ dk okbl lSaiy Hkh eftLVªsV ds le{k ugha fy;k x;k gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izdj.k esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 12-07-2025 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gS ,oa mlds fo#) vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr 66 o"khZ; chekj O;fDr gS ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo#) izdj.k esa vfHk;kstu Lohdfr izkIr ugha gqbZ gS] ftlls fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa fopkj.k izkjaHk ugha gksus ls fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur dk vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkosA

¶42

muds }kjk vius dFkuksa ds leFkZu esa fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkar

¶43

is'k fd;s x;s%&

¶44

1- Aman Bhatia Vs State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 SCC Online SC 1013

(4 of 5)

[2025:RJ-JP:41513]

[CRLMB-10923/2025]

2- State Of Lokayukta Police Vs S.B. Nagaraj, 2025 SCC Online 1175

¶49

3- Neeraj Dutta Vs State (NCT of Delhi), (2023) 4 SCC 731

¶50

4- Ritesh Sinha Vs State Of Uttar Pradesh, (2019) 8 SCC 1

¶51

5- (2012) 1 SCC 40, Sanjay Chandra Vs CBI

¶52

6- (2020) 13 SCC 791, P. Chidambaram Vs Directorate Of Enforcement

¶53

fo}ku fof'k"V yksd vfHk;kstd] lhchvkbZ dk nkSjkus cgl dFku gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr mes'k ekFkqj daiuh dk okWbl izslhMsaV gS] mlds }kjk daiuh dh vksj ls jkds'k Hklhu dks fj'or jkf'k nh xbZ Fkh] tks jkds'k Hklhu ds ?kj ls cjken gqbZ gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds Qksu fu;ekuqlkj o fof/k vuqlkj lfoZykal ij j[ks x, Fks ,oa mudh VsyhQksu okrkZvksa ds vk/kkj ij rS;kj VªkafLØIV ls muds fo#) vkjksfir vijk/k dh iw.kZr;k iqf"V gksus ij muds fo#) vkjksi i= U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izdj.k esa vfHk;qDr dks ekSds ij fj'or dh jkf'k ds lkFk idM+s tkus ij /kkjk 17, ih-lh-,DV ds izko/kkuksa dh ikyuk fd, tkus dh vko';drk ugha gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ij jksM fuekZ.k esa vkbZ dfe;ksa dks fNikus gsrq vf/kdkfj;ksa dks fj'or jkf'k nsus dk xaHkhj vkjksi gS] vr% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj fd;s tkosA

¶54

muds }kjk vius dFkuksa ds leFkZu esa fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkar is'k fd;s x;s%&

¶55

1- (1973) 1 SCC 471, R. M. Malkani V/s. State of Maharashtra 2- (2017) 13 SCC 751, State of Bihar & Anr. Vs. Amit Kumar @ Bachcha Rai

¶56

3- (2012) 12 SCC 384, State of Maharashtra through CBI, Anti Corruption Branch Mumbai Vs Balakrishna Dattatrya Kumbhar

¶57

eSaus i=koyh dk xgurkiwoZd o lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k] izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA

[2025:RJ-JP:41513]

[CRLMB-10923/2025]

(5 of 5)

gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gS ,oa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 12-07-2025 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSa] i=koyh ij izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) dksbZ iwoZ nks"kflf) dh lk{; miyC/k ugha gS] izdj.k esa vfHk;kstu Lohd`fr izkIr ugha gqbZ gS] ftlls izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA

¶62

,sls esa izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ rFkk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶63

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k 1- mes'k ekFkqj iq= Lo- Jh xksfoan pan ekFkqj] 2- jkds'k Hklhu iq= Lo- Jh ds-,y- Hklhu dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mUgsa cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rFkk ;fn os fdlh vU; izdj.k esa okafNr uk gks rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶64

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶65

RAHUL KUMAR KHANDELWAL /1&33(S)

Umesh Mathur S/O Late Shri Govind Chand Mathur v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Mathur S/O Late Shri Govind Chand Mathur v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Charanjeet Maheshwari Vs Smt Garima Maheshwari and Anr.

Jamnalal Meghwal Son of Shri Laxmiram Meghwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravindra Singh Shekhawat S/O Amar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sureshchand Jain S/O Shri Khayali Chand Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Bhasin S/O Late Shri K.L. Bhasin Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Priya Kumari D/O Shri Brahmanand Vs State of Rajasthan