Criminal Law – Bail – Murder Offence
High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a second bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS arising from a murder investigation. The Court observed strong circumstantial evidence and refused to enlarge the accused, dismissing the plea for bail.
The second bail application is hereby dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:40280]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 10785/2025 Raju @ Rajuddeen S/o Shri Pappu Khan, aged about 20 Years, R/o Sati Ka Chowk, Sarmathura, Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpur (Raj.). (Presently Confined In District Jail Dholpur).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Martand PratapSingh |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Vivek Sharma,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order
06/10/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:40280]
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-10785/2025]
Prakash and Vidya Devi in accordance with liberty granted by this Court vide order dated 22.05.2025.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J
SOURAV /2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a second application considering he was last seen with the deceased and evidence points to strangulation.
Whether the gravity of the offence and nature of allegations warrant denying bail despite claims of false implication.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Raju @ Rajuddeen
State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor
Manesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
