Allowed

Hrithik Thakurwani @ Hrithik Boxer S/O Shri Kishanchand Thakurwani v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Nov 2025CRLMB/10477/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS for a petitioner in custody since March 2023 in an FIR involving attempt to murder, extortion and Arms Act offences. Co-accused had already been granted bail. Considering parity, custody duration and likely trial delay, bail was granted subject to personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to appearing at every trial hearing.

Hrithik Thakurwani @ Hrithik Boxer S/O Shri Kishanchand… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:47040]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10477/2025

¶4

Hrithik Thakurwani @ Hrithik Boxer S/o Shri Kishanchand Thakurwani, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 12/178, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail At Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Adl. GA Cum PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 20/11/2025

¶11

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fjfrd Bkdqjokuh mQZ fjfrd ckWDlj dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 03-04-2025 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk] mls iqfyl Fkkuk tokgj lfdZy] t;iqj 'kgj iwoZ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 80@2023] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 307] 336] 384] 385] 386] 387] 506] 193] 201] 109 ,oa 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 3@25¼1&ch½¼,½] 3@25¼6½] 5@27¼7½¼k½] 3@25¼8½] 5@25¼8½] 3@26¼1½] 5@26¼2½] 5@27¼1½] 5@29¼,½ ,oa 5@29¼ch½ vkElZ ,DV esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶12

cgl lquh xbZA

¶13

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og funksZ"k gSA izkFkhZ ekpZ] 2023 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDrx.k _"kHk mQZ ;'k] mEesn flag] fo'kky 'kekZ] vfHk"ksd dksyh mQZ lksuw] vk'kh"k fo'uksbZ] iznhi 'kqDyk ds fu;fer tekur vkosnu&i= bl

[2025:RJ-JP:47040]

[CRLMB-10477/2025]

(2 of 2)

U;k;ky; ,oa led{k cSap }kjk iwoZ esa Lohdkj fd;s tk pqds gaS] izkFkhZ dk ekeyk muls fHkUu ugha gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gS] vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶19

geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdks a Z o fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izkFkhZ fnukad&ekpZ] 2023 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDrx.k _"kHk mQZ ;'k] mEesn flag] fo'kky 'kekZ] vfHk"ksd dksyh mQZ lksuw] vk'kh"k fo'uksbZ] iznhi 'kqDyk ds fu;fer tekur vkosnu&i= bl U;k;ky; ,oa led{k cSap }kjk iwoZ esa Lohdkj fd;s tk pqds gaS] izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA vr% lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds mDr tekur vkosnuksa] izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vk;h lk{;] izkFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; o vU; leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶20

ifj.kker% ;g tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@& :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fjfrd Bkdqjokuh mQZ fjfrd ckWDlj iq= Jh fd'kupan Bkdqjokuh dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶21

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶22

MANOJ ADWANI /04

Hrithik Thakurwani @ Hrithik Boxer S/O Shri Kishanchand Thakurwani v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hrithik Thakurwani @ Hrithik Boxer S/O Shri Kishanchand Thakurwani v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Sattar S/O Ummed Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Yakub @ Fakira S/O Astu @ Ragad Vs State of Rajasthan

Bablu S/O Gedaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangat Singh S/O Didar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Kumar S/O Shri Banwari Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sumit Tanwar S/O Sanjay Tuwar Vs State of Rajasthan