Allowed

Hariom Suman S/O Late Sh. Devi Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC28 Oct 2025CRLMA/538/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple points of bail applicants sought modification of bond conditions requiring monthly police presence. The High Court allowed the applications, directing appearance once every three months while retaining other original conditions.

What did the court decide?

The period of marking presence at the police station was modified from once a month to once in three months.

Hariom Suman S/O Late Sh. Devi Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[CRLMA-535/2025]

¶2

(1 of 3)

¶3

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶4

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 535/2025 IN

¶5

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.18335/2022

¶6

Durga Shankar Merotha S/o Sh. Mangalchand Merotha, Aged About 48 Years, R/o House No. 10, Shreenath Aawas, Budni Road, Police Station Kunhadi, Kota City, Rajasthan.

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 536/2025 IN

¶13

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12085/2023 Sanjay Kumar Kashyap S/o Sh. Jhabbu Lal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Sarkari School Ke Samne Wali Gali, Shriram Nagar, D.c.m. Kota, Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Kota, Rajasthan.

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶17

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 537/2025 IN

¶18

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.18335/2022

¶19

Giriraj Nayak S/o Sh. Babulal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o House No. 49, Shubh Lahbh Colony, Police Station Borkheda, Kota City, Rajasthan.

¶20

----Petitioner

¶21

Versus

¶22

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶23

----Respondent

¶24

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 538/2025 IN

¶25

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11684/2023

¶26

Hariom Suman S/o Late Sh. Devi Lal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Godam Ki Talai, Mangalpura, P.s. Kotwali, District Jhalawar. At Present House No. 204-B, Railway Workshop Colony, Near Kendriya Vidhyalay, P.s Railway Colony, Kota City Rajasthan.

¶27

----Petitioner

¶28

Versus

¶29

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

[CRLMA-535/2025]

(2 of 3)

----Respondent

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 539/2025 IN

¶34

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8931/2023

¶35

Yogesh Kulshrestha S/o Suresh Kulshrestha, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 728, Mahaveer Nagar Dvitya, Police Station -Mahaveer Nagar, Kota.

¶36

----Petitioner

¶37

Versus

¶38

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶39

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 541/2025 IN

¶40

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8468/2023

¶41

Himanshu Vijay S/o Late Sh. Ghanshyam Vijay, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 158 A, Ballabhbadi, Police Station Gumanpura, Kota City, Rajasthan.

¶42

----Petitioner

¶43

Versus

¶44

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶45

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 543/2025 IN

¶46

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.5460/2023

¶47

Radhika Naamdev W/o Shri Murli Manohar Naamdev, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Pancholi Mohalla, Mandola Ward, Baran, P.s. Kotwali, District Baran.

¶48

----Petitioner

¶49

Versus

¶50

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶51

----Respondent

¶52

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prateek Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP

¶53

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order

¶54

28/10/2025

¶55

These applications have been filed under Section 528 of BNSS on behalf of the applicants seeking modification of the

¶56

(3 of 3)

¶57

[CRLMA-535/2025]

¶58

orders dated 26.06.2023, 16.02.2024, 23.01.2024, 19.08.2023 & 10.07.2023 passed by this court.

¶59

It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that while allowing the bail applications of the applicants, it was directed by this court that applicants shall mark their presence in the concerned Police Station on first Monday of every month but applicants are facing difficulties in marking their presence. It is also submitted that applicants have been marking their presence regularly before the concerned police station since the date of their respective orders.

¶60

For the reasons mentioned in the applications, same are allowed.

¶61

It is hereby directed that henceforth, instead of marking presence on first Monday of every month, the applicants shall mark their presence in the concerned police station once in three months. However, other conditions mentioned in the orders dated 26.06.2023, 16.02.2024, 23.01.2024, 19.08.2023 & 10.07.2023 shall remain intact.

¶62

Accordingly, these applications are disposed of.

¶63

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶64

GAUTAM JAIN /2-8

Hariom Suman S/O Late Sh. Devi Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hariom Suman S/O Late Sh. Devi Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ratiram Meena S/O Shri Sriman Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemraj S/O Shri Heera Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Omega Elevators, Vs State of Rajasthan

Durga Shankar Merotha S/O Sh. Mangalchand Merotha Vs State of Rajasthan

Giriraj Nayak S/O Sh. Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Yogesh Kulshrestha S/O Suresh Kulshrestha Vs State of Rajasthan