Allowed

Yogesh Kulshrestha S/O Suresh Kulshrestha v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Sept 2025CRLMA/441/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed six bail modification applications. Applications seeking relaxation of monthly police station presence requirements to once every three months were permitted due to difficulty in compliance, while other bail conditions remained intact.

What did the court decide?

Modification of bail conditions allowing presence at police station once every three months instead of monthly.

Yogesh Kulshrestha S/O Suresh Kulshrestha Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 440/2025

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5868/2023

¶5

Yogesh Gehlot S/o Shri Brijmohan, R/o House No. 16, Amar Vihar, Police Station Borkheda, District Kota, Rajasthan.

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 441/2025 IN

¶12

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9153/2023

¶13

Yogesh Kulshrestha S/o Suresh Kulshrestha, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 728, Mahaveer Nagar Dvitya, Police Station Mahaveer Nagar, Kota.

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶17

----Respondent

¶18

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 442/2025 IN

¶19

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8322/2023

¶20

Lokesh Kumar Nagar S/o Ramkrishna Nagar, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of House No. A-11, Shivagi Nagar, Baran District Baran, Rajasthan.

¶21

----Petitioner

¶22

Versus

¶23

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶24

----Respondent

¶25

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 443/2025 IN

¶26

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 331/2023

¶27

Smt. Asha Saini W/o Hariom Suman, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 204B, Railway Workshop Colony, Near Central School, Kota Police Station Railway Colony District Kota.

¶28

----Petitioner

¶29

Versus

¶30

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

[CRLMA-440/2025]

(2 of 3)

----Respondent

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 444/2025 IN

¶35

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4596/2023

¶36

Smt. Shobharani W/o Shri Dinesh Pankaj, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Gopal Colony, Maliyon Ke Nohre Ke Pas, Baran, P.s Kotwali Baran, District Baran.

¶37

----Petitioner

¶38

Versus

¶39

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶40

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 445/2025 IN

¶41

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6100/2023

¶42

Dayaram Malav S/o Sh. Prabhu Lal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Near Patwar Ghar, Badgaon, P.s. Kunhadi, Kota Rajasthan.

¶43

----Petitioner

¶44

Versus

¶45

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶46

----Respondent

¶47

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 446/2025 IN

¶48

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9782/2023

¶49

Hemant Kumar Vijay S/o Shri Navalkishore Vijay, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Chaumukha Bajar (Baran Public School Ke Paas), Police Station Baran, District Baran.

¶50

----Petitioner

¶51

Versus

¶52

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶53

----Respondent

¶54

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 447/2025 IN

¶55

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6252/2023

¶56

Ankit Jain S/o Sh. Mahesh Jain, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 4-C43, Dadabadi Vistar Yojana, Kota, Police Station Dadabadi, District Kota Rajasthan.

¶57

----Petitioner

¶58

Versus

¶59

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

(3 of 3)

[CRLMA-440/2025]

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Girraj Prasad Bairwa
	Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore
	Mr. Mahendra Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. N.S. Dhakar,PP

¶64

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order

¶65

17/09/2025

¶66

These applications have been filed under Section 528 of BNSS on behalf of the applicants seeking modification of the orders dated 21.07.2023 and 04.08.2023 passed by this court.

¶67

It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that while allowing the bail applications of the applicants, it was directed by this court that applicants shall mark their presence in the concerned Police Station on first Monday of every month but applicants are suffering difficulties in marking their presence. It is also submitted that applicants have been marking their presence regularly before the concerned police station since the date of orders.

¶68

For the reasons mentioned in the applications, same are allowed.

¶69

It is hereby directed that henceforth, instead of marking presence on first Monday of every month, the applicants shall mark their presence in the concerned police station once in three months. However, other conditions mentioned in the orders dated 21.07.2023 and 04.08.2023 shall remain intact.

¶70

Accordingly, these applications are disposed of.

¶71

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶72

GAUTAM JAIN /51-58

Yogesh Kulshrestha S/O Suresh Kulshrestha v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Kulshrestha S/O Suresh Kulshrestha v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National Investigating Agency Vs State of Rajasthan

Madhav Kumar Saini @ Mintu @ Chandi S/O Rajesh Kumar Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Ramkaran Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Leelaram S/O Shri Sultan Vs State of Rajasthan

Gurvindra Singh S/O Dalbara Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemant Kumar Vijay S/O Shri Navalkishore Vijay Vs State of Rajasthan