Madhav Kumar Saini @ Mintu @ Chandi S/O Rajesh Kumar Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

[2025:RJ-JP:37741]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9454/2025

Madhav Kumar Saini @ Mintu @ Chandi S/o Rajesh Kumar Saini, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Front Of House No. 348, Scheme No. 8, Sonava Dungari Alwar (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Alwar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Mr.	Anupam Sharma with Harshit Parashar
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	N.S. Dhakar, PP with
	Mr.	Gaurav Gupta,Asstt. G.A.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶11

Order

¶12

16/09/2025

¶13

This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.193/2025 registered at Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 307 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 310(2) & 112(2) of BNS, 2023.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It has been alleged in the FIR in very specific terms that only four persons were involved in the act of Loot while police filed charge-sheet in this matter against

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:37741]

[CRLMB-9454/2025]

three persons and investigation has been kept pending against two persons. Counsel submits that no test identification parade has been conducted in this matter and mere recovery of one bag, two diary and key at the instance of the petitioner is not enough to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime. Counsel submits that one other case has also been registered against the petitioner wherein he is on bail. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner.

¶20

I have considered the contentions.

¶21

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances

¶22

of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application.

¶23

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Madhav Kumar Saini @ Mintu @ Chandi S/o Rajesh Kumar Saini shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that

(3 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:37741]

[CRLMB-9454/2025]

he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶28

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station.

¶29

Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.

¶30

If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.

¶31

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance.

¶32

The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶33

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶34

LALIT MOHAN /109

Madhav Kumar Saini @ Mintu @ Chandi S/O Rajesh Kumar Saini v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhav Kumar Saini @ Mintu @ Chandi S/O Rajesh Kumar Saini v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narsi @ Narendra S/O Rameshwar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Abhishek Son of Manoj Kumar Surela, Vs State of Rajasthan

Umesh Gurjar Son of Shri Madan Lal Gurjar Vs the State of Rajasthan

National Investigating Agency Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Ramkaran Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Jairam Devasi S/O Mangilal Devais Vs C.B.N.