Cancellation of anticipatory bail sought against respondents accused of cheating the complainant of Rs.2,10,000 via an agreement. Factual report showed respondents had appeared before the Investigating Officer, and police found no offence under Sections 467 and 468 IPC. Bail cancellation application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:15020]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No.107/2024
Ramotar Sharma S/o Shri Kishan Lal Sharma, R/o Plot No.294, Vasant Vihar B Sumel Road, Purani Chungi, Kanota, Jaipur City East.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Goutam, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG For Complainant : Mr. Vishwas Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
03/04/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:15020]
[CRLBC-107/2024]
(2 of 2)
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-17
2 issues framed by the court
Should anticipatory bail granted to respondent Nos.2 to 4 be cancelled for non-cooperation with investigation?
Was the offence under Sections 467 and 468 IPC made out on investigation?
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramotar Sharma S/o Shri Kishan Lal Sharma
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Shivram Meena S/o Shri Puniram Meena
Krishan Kumar Meena S/o Mangalram Meena
Sanwalram Meena S/o Laxminarayan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
