The court dismissed the S.B. Civil Restoration Application holding that it abated because the petitioner failed to file steps regarding the death of the owner respondent within the granted time.
Restoration application dismissed in abatement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:5981]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 361/2015
Madan Son Of Shri Ramchandra, R/o Nanglywal, Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. Swati Sharma for Mr. Girish |
|---|---|
| Khandelwal | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Kinshuk Jain with Ms. Rajni Singh |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
11/02/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:5981]
[CRES-361/2015]
(2 of 2)
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J
CHETNA BEHRANI /91
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the restoration application can be maintained when the primary owner respondent has expired and no representative was filed within the stipulated time.
Madan Son Of Shri Ramchandra
Chandrabhan S/o Shri Tokrandas
Oriental Insurance Company Limited
AShOK KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
