Allowed¶25

Rameshchandra Gautam S/O Shri Ramgopal Gautam v. Rajendra Singh Jhala S/O Sh. Vikram Singh

Rajasthan HC22 Jul 2025CRES/254/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; Justice Ganesh Ram Meena; order dated 22/07/2025; CRES-254/2025 in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.32/2025; civil restoration application allowed; appeal dismissed on 09.05.2025 pursuant to peremptory order dated 04.03.2025 for non-removal of defects restored to original number and position; applicants Rameshchandra Gautam, Maya Gautam, Priyanshu Gautam; respondents include truck driver Rajendra Singh Jhala, owner Nimesh Kumar and insurer ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.; Truck No. Gj31/t 1079; counsel Mr. Naseemuddin Qazi for petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.32/2025 to its original number and position. ¶25

Rameshchandra Gautam S/O Shri Ramgopal Gautam Vs Rajendra Singh Jhala S/O Sh. Vikram Singh — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:27318]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 254/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.32/2025

¶6

Rameshchandra Gautam S/o Shri Ramgopal Gautam, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Shivpark Ke Samne, Dadabari, Kota (Raj.)

¶7

Maya Gautam W/o Sh. Rameshchandra Gautam, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Shivpark Ke Samne, Dadabari, Kota (Raj.)

¶8

Priyanshu Gautam S/o Shri Ramesh Chandra Gautam, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Shivpark Ke Samne, Dadabari, Kota (Raj.)

¶9

----Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

Rajendra Singh Jhala S/o Sh. Vikram Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Boriya, Post Anyor, Talod, District Sabarkantha-Gujrat, (Driver Of The Truck No. Gj31/t 1079)

¶12

Nimesh Kumar S/o Jagdish Kumar Gor, R/o 31, Devbhumi Society, Siddhivinayak Mandir, Modasa, District Arawali Sabarkantha Gujrat (Owner Of The Truck No. Gj31/t 1079)

¶13

Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., Address Jhalawar Road, Kota (Raj.) (Insurer Of The Truck No. Gj31/t 1079)

¶14

----Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naseemuddin Qazi For Respondent(s) :

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

22/07/2025

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:27318]

[CRES-254/2025]

The present civil restoration application has been filed by the applicants/appellants for restoration of S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.32/2025, which was dismissed vide order dated 09.05.2025 in furtherance of peremptory order dated 04.03.2025 for want of removing the defect/s.

¶23

Heard.

¶24

Considered the submissions made at bar.

¶25

Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the applicants/appellants and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, same is allowed and it is ordered that S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.32/2025 be restored at its original number and position.

¶26

Accordingly, the present restoration application stands

¶27

allowed.

¶28

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶29

ARTI SHARMA /60

Rameshchandra Gautam S/O Shri Ramgopal Gautam v. Rajendra Singh Jhala S/O Sh. Vikram Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rameshchandra Gautam S/O Shri Ramgopal Gautam v. Rajendra Singh Jhala S/O Sh. Vikram Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ladsingh @ Udaisingh Son of Hakim Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Narayan Bareth S/O Shri Amar Singh Vs Kamlesh Kumar Meena S/O Shri Prahlad Meena

Smt Janki Devi W/O Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal Vs Smt Gyarsi Devi W/O Late Shri Raghunath Ji Bagra Brahmin

Smt. Prabhati Devi Vs Lal Chand S/O Shri Kishan Chand

Dhunaram Son of Chhajuram Vs Prem Chand Son of Banshidhar

Ganni Khan S/O Late Shri Lallu Khan Vs Fakru Khan S/O Fattu Khan