Dhunaram Son of Chhajuram v. Prem Chand Son of Banshidhar
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant.
This appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:27256]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1638/2023
Dhunaram Son Of Chhajuram, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Pathredi, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Appellant
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : None |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Vaibhav Jhankra, for |
| Mr. T.P Sharma,for R.3 |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
22/07/2025
No one is present on behalf of the appellant even in second round. Therefore this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Gaurav Srivastava /140
Dhunaram Son Of Chhajuram
Prem Chand Son Of Banshidhar
Rao Tejpal Singh
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court