Civil revision petition challenging the rejection of a plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The High Court upheld the lower court's decision, relying on settled law that only pleadings and documents are to be considered at this stage, finding no irregularity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:40534]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 296/2025
Shyamsunder S/o Shri Kishorilal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Bardod, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror Presently Resident At President Apartment Sector-10, Plot No. 18, Dwarka, New Delhi. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Vikas Rustagi S/o Shri Dharampal Rustagi Age About 54 Years, Resident Of Luharo Ka Mohalla, Bardod, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.).
----Defendant-Petitioner
Versus
----Plaintiffs-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
07/10/2025
;kph&izfroknh dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ,oa U;kf;d eftLVªsV] cgjksM+] ftyk dksViwryh&cgjksM+ }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k&117@2024 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 16-07-2025 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls ;kph&izfroknh dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&izfroknh dh cgl lquh] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
[CR-296/2025]
[2025:RJ-JP:40534]
(2 of 2)
oknhx.k dk ;g okn jgk gS fd oknh i{k }kjk fnukad 13-01-1974 dks oknxzLr tk;nkn 15]000@&:i;s esa ekSf[kd :i ls [kjhn dj dCtk izkIr fd;k x;k FkkA ;kph&izfroknh dh ;g vkifRr jgh gS fd cspkudrkZ dk uke izdV ugha fd;k gS rFkk izfroknh ds nRrd firk ftlls ;g laifRr [kjhnuk crk;k gS] fnukad 02-12-1973 dks gh eR;q gks xbZ Fkh] okn fe;kn ckgj gS] vfHkdFku izFken"V;k gh vln~Hkkfod gSA
fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mBkbZ xbZ vkifRr;ksa dks rF;ksa o fof/k dk fefJr iz'u ekurs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k ds ek/;e ls ;kph&izfroknh dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k gS] ftlesa dksbZ voS/kkfudrk ;k vfu;ferrk ugha gSA
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vidyarthi and Ors. (2024) 11 SCC 503 o Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamal Kumar Sen & Ors. (2018) 5 SCC 644 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; ek= oknh ds vfHkdFkuksa o okni= ds lkFk izLrqr nLrkostksa ij gh fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gSA
okn esa of.kZr rF;ksa o vfHkdFkuksa ls lqlaxr izfroknh dk cpko vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gSA
laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 16-07-2025 dh iqf"V djrs gq, ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA LFkxu vkosnu o vU; vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /02
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the plaint discloses a cause of action within the meaning of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd. Vs. Ashok VidyarthiRelied on¶20
Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vidyarthi and Ors. (2024) 11 SCC 503 · Who else cites this
Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamal Kumar SenRelied on¶20
Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamal Kumar Sen & Ors. (2018) 5 SCC 644 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shyamsunder
Gayatri Devi
Sanjay Kumar Sharma
Uma Shanker Vyas
Dinesh Kumawat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
