Dismissed

Smt. Shakuntala Devi Sharma W/O Shri Kapoor Chand Sharma v. Shri Nikhil Gurbani S/O Shri Govind Gurbani

Rajasthan HC30 Oct 2025CR/188/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged an order dismissing her suit under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The Court held that pleas regarding disputed specific performance and title cannot be decided at the threshold stage. The Court affirmed the order and dismissed the civil revision petition with costs.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed with Rs. 20,000 costs (Rs. 10,000 to respondents, Rs. 10,000 to High Court Fund).

Smt. Shakuntala Devi Sharma W/O Shri Kapoor Chand… — Property and Title | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:43523]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 188/2025

¶4

Smt. Shakuntala Devi Sharma W/o Shri Kapoor Chand Sharma, Aged About 80 Years, R/o Plat No. 102, Labaur Colony (Indra Colony), Banipark, Jaipur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Shri Nikhil Gurbani S/o Shri Govind Gurbani, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 126. Bhaskar Marg, Banipark, Jaipur.

¶8

Shri Bharat Adwani S/o Shri Rajkumar Adwani, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Plat No. 08, Sindhi Colony, Banipark, Jaipur.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Teeka Ram Meena, Adv. Ms. Garima Yadav, Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

30/10/2025

¶14

;kph&izfrokfn;k dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k dze&4] t;iqj egkuxj f}rh; }kjk nhokuh ewy okn la[;k 11@2025 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 05-04-2025 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls izfrokfn;k }kjk izLrqr vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ihlh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA

¶15

fo}ku vf/koDrk izfrokfn;k dk fuosnu gS fd viathd`r fodz; vuqca/k ds vk/kkj ij LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk vuqrks"k dk okn

¶16

(2 of 4) [CR-188/2025]

¶17

[2025:RJ-JP:43523]

¶18

iks"k.kh; ugha gS] tks izfrQy jkf'k vkaf'kd :i ls Hkqxrku fd;k tkuk crk;k gS mlds laca/k esa fojks/kkHkkl gS] izfrokfn;k dk oknxzLr Hkwfe esa LokfeRo fookfnr gks x;k] fodz; vuqca/k dh vuqikyuk gsrq tks le; fu/kkZfjr gqvk Fkk mlesa euekus rjhds ls oknh i{k }kjk ifjorZu fd;k x;k gS vkSj bu vk/kkjksa ij izfrokfn;k dh vksj ls vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ihlh- ds rgr izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk] ysfdu fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk rF;ksa o fof/k ds foijhr tkdj vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] tks vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶19

fo}ku vf/koDrk foi{kh&oknhx.k }kjk mijksDr lHkh dkj.k vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds Ldksi ls ckgj gksuk crkrs gq, rFkk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vk{ksfir vkns'k dks fof/klEer gksuk crkrs gq, fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶20

izdj.k ds lqlaxr rF; ;g gS fd oknhx.k }kjk izfrokfn;k ds fo:) fodz; vuqca/k dh fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk o LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk ds vuqrks"k ds ckcr okn izLrqr dj vfHkdfFkr fd;k fd izfrokfn;k us oknxzLr laifRr oknhx.k dks 03 djksM :i;s ds izfrQy ewY; ij fodz; djuk r; dj vkaf'kd izfrQy jkf'k izkIr dh] 03 yk[k :i;s udn fn;s rFkk 21 yk[k Mh0Mh0 ds tfj, izfrokfn;k dks vnk fd;s] fodz; vuqca/k ds rgr 105 fnu esa nLrkost fu"ikfnr gksuk r; gqvk Fkk] ysfdu ckotwn uksfVl ds izfrokfn;k dk ikyuk ds laca/k esa mis{kkiw.kZ o badkjh dk O;ogkj jgk vkSj ml vk/kkj ij fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk o LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk vuqrks"k pkgkA

[CR-188/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:43523]

(3 of 4)

fo}ku vf/koDrk izfrokfn;k dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d fu.kZ; The Correspondence, RBANMS Educational Institution Vs. B. Gunashekar & Another. 2025 INSC 490 dk voyksdu fd;k] ftlesa fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk dk vuqrks"k ugha pkgk x;k FkkA orZeku ekeys esa fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk dk vuqrks"k pkgk x;k gS vkSj mlds lkFk LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk vuqrks"k Dyse fd;k tkuk iw.kZr% fof/klEer gSA fodz; vuqca/k ds mijkar izfrokfn;k dk LokfeRo fookfnr gks x;k gS] bl izdkj dh vkifRr fodzsrk }kjk yh tk ldrh gS vFkok ugha] ;g fopkj.k dk fo"k; gS] ijarq ;g vkifRr Hkh vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds Ldksi esa ugha vkrh gSA vkaf'kd izfrQy jkf'k ds Hkqxrku vFkok nLrkost dh ln~Hkkfodrk vkfn dk fo"k; Hkh rF;ksa dk fo"k; gS vkSj lk{; ds mijkar fopkj.k esa gh r; gks ldrk gSA

¶25

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vidyarthi and Ors. (2024) 11 SCC 503 o Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamal Kumar Sen & Ors. (2018) 5 SCC 644 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; ek= oknh ds vfHkdFkuksa o okni= ds lkFk izLrqr nLrkostksa ij gh fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gSA

¶26

mijksDr foospukuqlkj Li"V gS fd izfrokfn;k dh vksj ls tks Hkh vkifRr yh x;h gS og vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dh ifjf/k esa nwj&nwj rd ugha vkrh gS] fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k iw.kZr% rF;ksa o fof/k ds

[2025:RJ-JP:43523]

[CR-188/2025]

(4 of 4)

vuq:i gS] mlesa dksbZ vfu;ferrk ;k voS/kkfudrk ugha gS rFkk vk{ksfir vkns'k iq"V gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶31

orZEkku ekeys esa izfrokfn;k dh vksj ls tks vkifRr;ka yh x;h gS] og fdlh Hkh :i esa vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds Ldksi esa ugha vkrh gSA lkekU; :i ls ;g ns[kk x;k gS fd okn dk fopkj.k izkjaHk gks mlls iwoZ gh vuqfpr vk/kkjksa ij vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr vkosnu is'k dj fopkj.k dh dk;Zokgh dks ckf/kr fd;s tkus dk iz;kl fd;k tkrk gS] blls uk dsoy izdj.k fo'ks"k foyafcr gksrk gS] vfirq bl izdkj ds vkpj.k ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; lfgr bl U;k;ky; dk le; tks ln~Hkkfod i{kdkjksa ds fy, gksrk gS] dk viO;; gksrk gS vkSj bl izdkj dh izo`fRr fu:Rlkfgr gksuk vko';d gSA

¶32

laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 05-04-2025 dh iqf"V djrs gq, ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk 20]000@&:i;s dksLV ij [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA mijksDr dksLV jkf'k esa ls 10]000@&:i;s oknh dks vnk djus ds fy, vkt ls nks ekg esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izfrokfn;k }kjk tek djk;s tk;saxs rFkk 'ks"k 10]000@&:i;s dh jkf'k lacaf/kr ftyk fof/kd lsok izkf/kdj.k esa tek djk;h tk,xhA ;g dksLV jkf'k izfrokfn;k dh izfrj{kk lk{; is'k djus gsrq iwoZorhZ 'krZ gksxhA

¶33

LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh blh vuqlkj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA vkns'k dh izfr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks izsf"kr dh tkosA

¶34

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶35

Murari Lal Sharma /26

Smt. Shakuntala Devi Sharma W/O Shri Kapoor Chand Sharma v. Shri Nikhil Gurbani S/O Shri Govind Gurbani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Shakuntala Devi Sharma W/O Shri Kapoor Chand Sharma v. Shri Nikhil Gurbani S/O Shri Govind Gurbani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suvalal Khinchi @ Tota @ Suaa Son of Manohar Lal Khatik Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vishwanath Atrey through L R Vs Smt Pushpa Devi

Smt. Indrakanwar W/O Late Shri Jaisingh Vs Rajesh Agarwal S/O Late Shri Krishnakant Agarwal

Mahalaxmi Minerals Vs Shri Arijeet Banerjee

Mohan Singh Panwar S/O Shri Ram Dayal Singh, Vs Shreya Guha

Yashpal Goswami S/O Shri Shiv Goswami Vs State of Rajasthan