Petition concerning pension and related dues against state authorities. Counsel for the petitioner stated compliance with the respondents' order had been made; the court disposed of the writ petition with liberty to revive it if required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:40853]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
,dy ihB flfoy voekuuk ;kfpdk la[;k&09@2024
Jherh iRrk nsoh Lo0 Jh fxjkZt izlkn /kksch mez 60 o"kZ] fuoklh& gVhyk lsV dh cxhph] okMZ uEcj 6] xaxkiqjflVh] ftyk lokbZ ek/kksiqj] jktLFkkuA
---------izkFkhZ;k
cuke
---------foi{khx.k
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Ms. Harshita, Adv. Mr. Yash Joshi, Adv. for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
08/10/2025
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd bl izdj.k esa foi{kh ds vuqlkj vkns'k dh ikyuk gks pqdh gS] os vius i{kdkj ls laidZ dj lR;kiu djuk pkgrs gSa rFkk vko';drk gksus ij bl ;kfpdk dks "Revive" djokus dh Lora=rk ds lkFk ;g ;kfpdk bl LVst ij fuLrkfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
mijksDr Lora=rk iznku djrs gq, ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS rFkk tkjh'kqnk uksfVl lekIr fd;s tkrs gSaA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /98
Smt. Prita Devi
Akshesh Kumar
Kuldeep Meena
Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
